Literature DB >> 20607282

How the social-evaluative context modulates processes of cognitive control.

Gesine Dreisbach1, Svenja Böttcher.   

Abstract

Cognitive control enables intelligent systems to select relevant information in the face of distracting information. The aim of the research presented here was to investigate the influence of the social-evaluative context on processes of cognitive control. Female participants had to perform the Erikson flanker task with each trial being preceded by a photograph of an attractive woman or a beautiful landscape. Concurrently, another person (partner or fellow student) either evaluated the attractiveness of the pictures of the women or the beauty of the landscapes. Participants showed increased flanker interference on trials following the presentation of pictures of attractive women, but only, if these were concurrently evaluated by another person. By contrast, in the control conditions (social presence without concurrent picture evaluation, or picture evaluation without social presence) no such effect occurred. That is, the concurrent evaluation task selectively increased distractibility presumably due to the affective reaction to the social-evaluative context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20607282     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0298-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  25 in total

1.  Positive mood and executive function: evidence from stroop and fluency tasks.

Authors:  Louise H Phillips; Rebecca Bull; Ewan Adams; Lisa Fraser
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2002-03

2.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity.

Authors:  Philip Gable; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-14

4.  Blind jealousy? Romantic insecurity increases emotion-induced failures of visual perception.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Elana Graber; Amber Belcher; C Veronica Smith
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-04

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: the costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Unconscious and spontaneous and...complex: the three selves model of social comparison assimilation and contrast.

Authors:  Hart Blanton; Diederik A Stapel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-06

10.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Socially triggered negative affect impairs performance in simple cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Svenja Böttcher; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-20

2.  The pervasive nature of unconscious social information processing in executive control.

Authors:  Ranjani Prabhakaran; Jeremy R Gray
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.