Literature DB >> 16216400

How positive affect modulates cognitive control: the costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability.

Gesine Dreisbach1.   

Abstract

Adaptive action in a constantly changing environment requires the ability to maintain intentions and goals over time and to flexibly switch between these goals in response to significant changes. argued that positive affect modulates these antagonistic control demands in favor of a more flexible but also more distractible behavior. In the present paper, the author will present further evidence for the affective modulation of cognitive control: mild positive affect reduced maintenance capability in a simple cuing paradigm (the AX Continuous Performance Task) as compared to negative and neutral affect. This reduced maintenance capability results in costs when a to be maintained goal has to be executed and conversely results in benefits when a to be maintained goal unexpectedly changes. The data will be discussed with respect to existing theories on positive affect, cognitive control, and dopamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16216400     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  69 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Interactions between mood and the structure of semantic memory: event-related potentials evidence.

Authors:  Ana P Pinheiro; Elisabetta del Re; Paul G Nestor; Robert W McCarley; Óscar F Gonçalves; Margaret Niznikiewicz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Mary H Maclean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

5.  Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding.

Authors:  Taylor W Schmitz; Eve De Rosa; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Affective modulation of cognitive control is determined by performance-contingency and mediated by ventromedial prefrontal and cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Ruth M Krebs; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of the brief viewing of emotional stimuli on understanding of insight solutions.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency.

Authors:  Melissa A Cyders; Gregory T Smith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Longitudinal validation of the urgency traits over the first year of college.

Authors:  Melissa A Cyders; Gregory T Smith
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-01

Review 10.  An attentional scope model of rumination.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.