Literature DB >> 20424047

The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity.

Philip Gable1, Eddie Harmon-Jones.   

Abstract

Positive and negative affects high in motivational intensity cause a narrowing of attentional focus. In contrast, positive affects low in motivational intensity cause a broadening of attentional focus. The attentional consequences of negative affects low in motivational intensity have not been experimentally investigated. Experiment 1 compared the attentional consequences of negative affect low in motivational intensity (sadness) relative to a neutral affective state. Results indicated that low-motivation negative affect caused attentional broadening. Experiment 2 found that disgust, a high-motivation negative affect not previously investigated in attentional studies, narrowed attentional focus. These experiments support the conceptual model linking high-motivation affective states to narrowed attention and low-motivation affective states to broadened attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424047     DOI: 10.1177/0956797609359622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  62 in total

1.  Reconfiguration of brain networks supporting inhibition of emotional challenge.

Authors:  Morgan E Bartholomew; Cindy M Yee; Wendy Heller; Gregory A Miller; Jeffrey M Spielberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Matthew R Sutherland
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

3.  Supervisory control system and frontal asymmetry: neurophysiological traits of emotion-based impulsivity.

Authors:  Philip A Gable; Nicole C Mechin; Joshua A Hicks; David L Adams
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Heavy drinking, impulsivity and attentional narrowing following alcohol cue exposure.

Authors:  Joshua A Hicks; Sherecce Fields; William E Davis; Philip A Gable
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The volatile nature of positive affect effects: opposite effects of positive affect and time on task on proactive control.

Authors:  Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-04

7.  Bidirectional associations between emotions and school adjustment.

Authors:  Maciel M Hernández; Nancy Eisenberg; Carlos Valiente; Tracy L Spinrad; Rebecca H Berger; Sarah K VanSchyndel; Kassondra M Silva; Anjolii Diaz; Marilyn S Thompson; Diana E Gal; Jody Southworth
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2018-01-10

8.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Naomi Vanlessen; Valentina Rossi; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Socially triggered negative affect impairs performance in simple cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Svenja Böttcher; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Attentional flexibility during approach and avoidance motivational states: the role of context in shifts of attentional breadth.

Authors:  Rebecca D Calcott; Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.