OBJECTIVE: An ideal marker for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) should also differentiate between men with isolated high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and those with PCa. Prostate Cancer Gene 3 (PCA3) is a highly specific PCa gene and its score, in relation to the PSA gene in post-prostate massage urine (PMU-PCA3), seems to be useful in ruling out PCa, especially after a negative prostate biopsy. Because PCA3 is also expressed in the HGPIN lesion, the aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of PMU-PCA3 scores for ruling out PCa in men with previous HGPIN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PMU-PCA3 score was assessed by quantitative PCR (multiplex research assay) in 244 men subjected to prostate biopsy: 64 men with an isolated HGPIN (no cancer detected after two or more repeated biopsies), 83 men with PCa and 97 men with benign pathology findings (BP: no PCa, HGPIN or ASAP). RESULTS: The median PMU-PCA3 score was 1.56 in men with BP, 2.01 in men with HGPIN (p = 0.128) and 9.06 in men with PCa (p = 0.008). The AUC in the ROC analysis was 0.705 in the subset of men with BP and PCa, while it decreased to 0.629 when only men with isolated HGPIN and PCa were included in the analysis. Fixing the sensitivity of the PMU-PCA3 score at 90%, its specificity was 79% in men with BP and 69% in men with isolated HGPIN. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the PMU-PCA3 score to rule out PCa in men with HGPIN is lower than in men with BP.
OBJECTIVE: An ideal marker for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) should also differentiate between men with isolated high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and those with PCa. Prostate Cancer Gene 3 (PCA3) is a highly specific PCa gene and its score, in relation to the PSA gene in post-prostate massage urine (PMU-PCA3), seems to be useful in ruling out PCa, especially after a negative prostate biopsy. Because PCA3 is also expressed in the HGPIN lesion, the aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of PMU-PCA3 scores for ruling out PCa in men with previous HGPIN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PMU-PCA3 score was assessed by quantitative PCR (multiplex research assay) in 244 men subjected to prostate biopsy: 64 men with an isolated HGPIN (no cancer detected after two or more repeated biopsies), 83 men with PCa and 97 men with benign pathology findings (BP: no PCa, HGPIN or ASAP). RESULTS: The median PMU-PCA3 score was 1.56 in men with BP, 2.01 in men with HGPIN (p = 0.128) and 9.06 in men with PCa (p = 0.008). The AUC in the ROC analysis was 0.705 in the subset of men with BP and PCa, while it decreased to 0.629 when only men with isolated HGPIN and PCa were included in the analysis. Fixing the sensitivity of the PMU-PCA3 score at 90%, its specificity was 79% in men with BP and 69% in men with isolated HGPIN. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the PMU-PCA3 score to rule out PCa in men with HGPIN is lower than in men with BP.
Authors: Ina L Deras; Sheila M J Aubin; Amy Blase; John R Day; Seongjoon Koo; Alan W Partin; William J Ellis; Leonard S Marks; Yves Fradet; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Groskopf Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: M J Bussemakers; A van Bokhoven; G W Verhaegh; F P Smit; H F Karthaus; J A Schalken; F M Debruyne; N Ru; W B Isaacs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Martijn P M Q van Gils; Daphne Hessels; Onno van Hooij; Sander A Jannink; W Pim Peelen; Suzanne L J Hanssen; J Alfred Witjes; Erik B Cornel; Herbert F M Karthaus; Geert A H J Smits; Gerhard A Dijkman; Peter F A Mulders; Jack A Schalken Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alexander Haese; Alexandre de la Taille; Hendrik van Poppel; Michael Marberger; Arnulf Stenzl; Peter F A Mulders; Hartwig Huland; Clément-Claude Abbou; Mesut Remzi; Martina Tinzl; Susan Feyerabend; Alexander B Stillebroer; Martijn P M Q van Gils; Jack A Schalken Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Daphne Hessels; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Inge van Oort; Herbert F M Karthaus; Geert J L van Leenders; Bianca van Balken; Lambertus A Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Jack A Schalken Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Felix K Chun; Alexandre de la Taille; Hendrik van Poppel; Michael Marberger; Arnulf Stenzl; Peter F A Mulders; Hartwig Huland; Clement-Claude Abbou; Alexander B Stillebroer; Martijn P M Q van Gils; Jack A Schalken; Yves Fradet; Leonard S Marks; William Ellis; Alan W Partin; Alexander Haese Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Natalia Cernei; Zbynek Heger; Jaromir Gumulec; Ondrej Zitka; Michal Masarik; Petr Babula; Tomas Eckschlager; Marie Stiborova; Rene Kizek; Vojtech Adam Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Roberta Merola; Luigi Tomao; Anna Antenucci; Isabella Sperduti; Steno Sentinelli; Serena Masi; Chiara Mandoj; Giulia Orlandi; Rocco Papalia; Salvatore Guaglianone; Manuela Costantini; Giuseppe Cusumano; Giovanni Cigliana; Paolo Ascenzi; Michele Gallucci; Laura Conti Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-02-06
Authors: Mustafa Işın; Ege Uysaler; Emre Özgür; Hikmet Köseoğlu; Öner Şanlı; Ömer B Yücel; Uğur Gezer; Nejat Dalay Journal: Front Genet Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Jeffrey J Tosoian; Rodney L Dunn; Yashar S Niknafs; Anjan Saha; Randy A Vince; Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Javed Siddiqui; Jack Groskopf; Steven J Jacobsen; Scott A Tomlins; Lakshmi P Kunju; Todd M Morgan; Simpa S Salami; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Aruna V Sarma Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2021-05-25