Literature DB >> 21877172

Age-specific PCA3 score reference values for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Tobias Klatte1, Matthias Waldert, Michela de Martino, Georg Schatzl, Christine Mannhalter, Mesut Remzi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of age on PCA3 score and the utility of age-specific reference values in predicting initial prostate biopsy (pBx) outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included 205 men who underwent an initial 14-core TRUS-guided pBx due to PSA > 3.0 ng/ml or suspicious digital-rectal examination (DRE). PCA3 scores were measured with the Progensa assay. Linear regression models were fit to identify factors that impact PCA3 score and to determine age-specific reference values. Predictive accuracies of logistic regression models predicting presence of prostate cancer (PCa) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The positive biopsy rate was 37%. In multivariable linear regression, age (P < 0.001), presence of PCa (P < 0.001), and multifocal HG-PIN (P = 0.012) were independent predictors of PCA3 score. Age showed the strongest impact on PCA3 score (T = 4.77). The upper 95% confidence interval of PCA3 score in each age category was defined as the age-specific limit. A PCA3-score over the age-specific limit (PCA3-age) was associated with an 4.17-fold increased odds of being diagnosed with PCa (P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models predicting the presence of PCa, predictive accuracy of a base model (age, DRE, PSA, volume) increased from 69.6 to 75.4% (P = 0.037) by adding the continuous PCA3 score, to 73.9% (P = 0.098) with the 35 cutoff (PCA3-35) and to 77.1% (P = 0.008) with PCA3-age.
CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 score increases with age, independent of PCa presence. Age-specific PCA3 score reference values are superior to PSA, continuous PCA3 score, and PCA3-35 in predicting initial pBx outcome. Therefore, an age-adjusted PCA3 score should be used for interpretation of the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877172     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0749-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  29 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: novel aspects of diagnostics and surgical technology.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Axel S Merseburger; Martin Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Clinical evaluation of the PCA3 assay in guiding initial biopsy decisions.

Authors:  Alexandre de la Taille; Jacques Irani; Markus Graefen; Felix Chun; Theo de Reijke; Paul Kil; Paolo Gontero; Alain Mottaz; Alexander Haese
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome in populations at risk: validation in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE trial.

Authors:  Sheila M J Aubin; Jennifer Reid; Mark J Sarno; Amy Blase; Jacqueline Aussie; Harry Rittenhouse; Roger Rittmaster; Gerald L Andriole; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Behavior of the PCA3 gene in the urine of men with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Juan Morote; Marina Rigau; Marta Garcia; Carmen Mir; Carlos Ballesteros; Jacques Planas; Carles X Raventós; José Placer; Inés M de Torres; Jaume Reventós; Andreas Doll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Use of a combination of biomarkers in serum and urine to improve detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Celia Prior; Francisco Guillen-Grima; Jose E Robles; David Rosell; Jose M Fernandez-Montero; Xabier Agirre; Raúl Catena; Alfonso Calvo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The effects of aging on the molecular and cellular composition of the prostate microenvironment.

Authors:  Daniella Bianchi-Frias; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Ilsa M Coleman; Stephen R Plymate; May J Reed; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Gosselaar; R Kranse; M J Roobol; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 10.  Identification of molecular targets in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Christopher P Evans
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transperineal template-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with at least two prior negative biopsies.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Natalia Swietek; Georg Schatzl; Matthias Waldert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Elissa C Brown; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Ziding Feng; Martin E Gleave; Raymond S Lance; Martin G Sanda; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Clinical evaluation of prostate cancer gene 3 score in diagnosis among Chinese men with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Kathleen H Reilly; Hui-Zhen Zhang; Hai-Bo Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 4.  Translational progress on tumor biomarkers.

Authors:  Hongwei Guo; Xiaolin Zhou; Yi Lu; Liye Xie; Qian Chen; Evan T Keller; Qian Liu; Qinghua Zhou; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Association of Urinary MyProstateScore, Age, and Prostate Volume in a Longitudinal Cohort of Healthy Men: Long-term Findings from the Olmsted County Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Rodney L Dunn; Yashar S Niknafs; Anjan Saha; Randy A Vince; Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Javed Siddiqui; Jack Groskopf; Steven J Jacobsen; Scott A Tomlins; Lakshmi P Kunju; Todd M Morgan; Simpa S Salami; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Aruna V Sarma
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.