Literature DB >> 26437383

Extinction and spontaneous recovery of spatial behavior in pigeons.

Kenneth J Leising1, Jared Wong2, Aaron P Blaisdell2.   

Abstract

We investigated extinction and spontaneous recovery of spatial associations using a landmark-based appetitive search task in a touchscreen preparation with pigeons. Four visual landmarks (A, B, C, and D) were separately established as signals of a hidden reinforced target among an 8 × 7 array of potential target locations. The target was located above landmarks (LM) A and C and below B and D. After conditioning, A and B were extinguished. Responding to A and C was assessed on probe tests 2 days following extinction, whereas, B and D were tested 14 days after extinction. We observed spontaneous recovery from spatial extinction following a 14-day, but not a 2-day, postextinction retention interval. Furthermore, by plotting the spatial distribution of responding across the X and Y axes during testing, we found that spontaneous recovery of responding to the target in our task was due to enhanced spatial control (i.e., a change in the overall distribution of responses) following the long delay to testing. These results add spatial extinction and spontaneous recovery to the list of findings supporting the assertion that extinction involves new learning that attenuates the originally acquired response, and that original learning of the spatial relationship between paired events survives extinction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26437383      PMCID: PMC4598953          DOI: 10.1037/xan0000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  20 in total

1.  Recovery effects after extinction in the Morris swimming pool navigation task.

Authors:  José Prados; Raúl D Manteiga; Joan Sansa
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons.

Authors:  Kosuke Sawa; Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

3.  Secondary extinction in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Drina Vurbic; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Seth Roberts; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

5.  Occasion setting during a spatial-search task with pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Jordan S Hall; Joshua E Wolf; Chad M Ruprecht
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-04

Review 7.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; T A Mark; A P King; P E Latham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

9.  Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  Spatial integration with rats.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; T Rodrigo; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.