Literature DB >> 16481125

Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons.

Ken Cheng1, Marcia L Spetch, Debbie M Kelly, Verner P Bingman.   

Abstract

Roberts and Van Veldhuizen's [Roberts, W.A., Van Veldhuizen, N., 1985. Spatial memory in pigeons on the radial maze. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Proc. 11, 241-260] study on pigeons in the radial maze sparked research on landmark use by pigeons in lab-based tasks as well as variants of the radial-maze task. Pigeons perform well on open-field versions of the radial maze, with feeders scattered on the laboratory floor. Pigeons can also be trained to search precisely for buried food. The search can be based on multiple landmarks, but is sometimes controlled by just one or two landmarks, with the preferred landmarks varying across individuals. Findings are similar in landmark-based searching on a computer monitor and on a lab floor, despite many differences between the two kinds of tasks. A number of general learning principles are found in landmark-based searching, such as cue competition, generalization and peak shift, and selective attention. Pigeons also learn the geometry of the environment in which they are searching. Neurophysiological studies have implicated the hippocampal formation (HF) in avian spatial cognition, with the right hippocampus hypothesized to play a more important role in the spatial recognition of goal locations. Most recently, single-cell recording from the pigeon's hippocampal formation has revealed cells with different properties from the classic 'place' cells of rats, as well as differences in the two sides of the hippocampus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481125     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on bilateral facial symmetry.

Authors:  Adam Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  What scatter-hoarding animals have taught us about small-scale navigation.

Authors:  Kristy L Gould; Debbie M Kelly; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Path integration, views, search, and matched filters: the contributions of Rüdiger Wehner to the study of orientation and navigation.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Cody A Freas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Towards describing scenes by animals: Pigeons' ordinal discrimination of objects varying in depth.

Authors:  Suzanne L Gray; Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009-01-01

6.  Stable panoramic views facilitate snap-shot like memories for spatial reorientation in homing pigeons.

Authors:  Tommaso Pecchia; Anna Gagliardo; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The orientation of homing pigeons (Columba livia f.d.) with and without navigational experience in a two-dimensional environment.

Authors:  Julia Mehlhorn; Gerd Rehkaemper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Finding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation.

Authors:  Simon Jetzschke; Marc O Ernst; Julia Froehlich; Norbert Boeddeker
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Taking an insect-inspired approach to bird navigation.

Authors:  David J Pritchard; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.