Literature DB >> 20606180

Public reporting on hospital process improvements is linked to better patient outcomes.

Rachel M Werner1, Eric T Bradlow.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publicly reports so-called process performance at all U.S. hospitals, such as whether certain recommended treatments are given to specific types of patients. We examined whether hospital performance on key process indicators improved during the three years since this reporting began. We also studied whether or not these changes improved patient outcomes or yielded other quality improvements, such as reduced hospital readmission rates. We found that, from 2004 to 2006, hospital process performance improved and was associated with better patient and quality outcomes. Most notably, for acute myocardial infarction, performance improvements were associated with declines in mortality rates, lengths-of-stay, and readmission rates. Although we cannot conclude that public reporting caused the improvement in processes or outcomes, these results are encouraging, since improving process performance may improve quality more broadly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606180     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  24 in total

1.  Relationship between Leapfrog Safe Practices Survey and outcomes in trauma.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; J Wayne Meredith; Patricia W Stone; Yue Li; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10

2.  How health care organizations are using data on patients' race and ethnicity to improve quality of care.

Authors:  Ruth Thorlby; Selena Jorgensen; Bruce Siegel; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

Review 4.  Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Brian Doyle; Cheryl L Damberg; Kanaka Shetty; David A Ganz; Neil S Wenger; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Quality and Outcomes of Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ling Chen; Alfred I Neugut; Catherine A Richards; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  Effects of Public Reporting Legislation of Nurse Staffing: A Trend Analysis.

Authors:  Pamela B de Cordova; Jeannette Rogowski; Kathryn A Riman; Matthew D McHugh
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  Relationship between hospital financial performance and publicly reported outcomes.

Authors:  Oanh Kieu Nguyen; Ethan A Halm; Anil N Makam
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  The association of hospital characteristics and quality improvement activities in inpatient medical services.

Authors:  Joseph D Restuccia; David Mohr; Mark Meterko; Kelly Stolzmann; Peter Kaboli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Public Reporting of Mortality Rates for Hospitalized Medicare Patients and Trends in Mortality for Reported Conditions.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The Joint Commission Children's Asthma Care quality measures and asthma readmissions.

Authors:  Bernhard A Fassl; Flory L Nkoy; Bryan L Stone; Rajendu Srivastava; Tamara D Simon; Derek A Uchida; Karmella Koopmeiners; Tom Greene; Lawrence J Cook; Christopher G Maloney
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.