BACKGROUND: Public reporting is seen as a powerful quality improvement tool, but data to support its efficacy are limited. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Compare program initially reported process metrics only but started reporting mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia in 2008. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether public reporting of mortality rates was associated with lower mortality rates for these conditions among Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN: For 2005 to 2007, process-only reporting was considered; for 2008 to 2012, process and mortality reporting was considered. Changes in mortality trends before and during reporting periods were estimated by using patient-level hierarchical modeling. Nonreported medical conditions were used as a secular control. SETTING: U.S. acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 20 707 266 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized from January 2005 through November 2012. MEASUREMENTS: 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates. RESULTS: Mortality rates for the 3 publicly reported conditions were changing at an absolute rate of -0.23% per quarter during process-only reporting, but this change slowed to a rate of -0.09% per quarter during process and mortality reporting (change, 0.13% per quarter; 95% CI, 0.12% to 0.14%). Mortality for nonreported conditions was changing at -0.17% per quarter during process-only reporting and slowed slightly to -0.11% per quarter during process and mortality reporting (change, 0.06% per quarter; CI, 0.05% to 0.07%). LIMITATION: Administrative data may have limited ability to account for changes in patient complexity over time. CONCLUSION: Changes in mortality trends suggest that reporting in Hospital Compare was associated with a slowing, rather than an improvement, in the ongoing decline in mortality among Medicare patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
BACKGROUND: Public reporting is seen as a powerful quality improvement tool, but data to support its efficacy are limited. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Compare program initially reported process metrics only but started reporting mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia in 2008. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether public reporting of mortality rates was associated with lower mortality rates for these conditions among Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN: For 2005 to 2007, process-only reporting was considered; for 2008 to 2012, process and mortality reporting was considered. Changes in mortality trends before and during reporting periods were estimated by using patient-level hierarchical modeling. Nonreported medical conditions were used as a secular control. SETTING: U.S. acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 20 707 266 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized from January 2005 through November 2012. MEASUREMENTS: 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates. RESULTS: Mortality rates for the 3 publicly reported conditions were changing at an absolute rate of -0.23% per quarter during process-only reporting, but this change slowed to a rate of -0.09% per quarter during process and mortality reporting (change, 0.13% per quarter; 95% CI, 0.12% to 0.14%). Mortality for nonreported conditions was changing at -0.17% per quarter during process-only reporting and slowed slightly to -0.11% per quarter during process and mortality reporting (change, 0.06% per quarter; CI, 0.05% to 0.07%). LIMITATION: Administrative data may have limited ability to account for changes in patient complexity over time. CONCLUSION: Changes in mortality trends suggest that reporting in Hospital Compare was associated with a slowing, rather than an improvement, in the ongoing decline in mortality among Medicare patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Authors: Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-11-09
Authors: Paul S Chan; Manesh R Patel; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; Gregory J Dehmer; Kevin Kennedy; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; W Douglas Weaver; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; Ralph G Brindis; John A Spertus Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dale W Bratzler; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Walter J O'Donnell; Mark Metersky; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Brandon C Maughan; Zachary F Meisel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Michelle P Lin; Warren M Perry; Jeremiah D Schuur; Jesse M Pines; Constance L Kizzie-Gillett; William Vaughan; Corita R Grudzen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Kumar Dharmarajan; Yongfei Wang; Zhenqiu Lin; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Joseph S Ross; Leora I Horwitz; Nihar R Desai; Lisa G Suter; Elizabeth E Drye; Susannah M Bernheim; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David Metcalfe; Arturo J Rios Diaz; Olubode A Olufajo; M Sofia Massa; Nicole Abm Ketelaar; Signe A Flottorp; Daniel C Perry Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-09-06
Authors: Nicholas E Ingraham; Samantha King; Jennifer Proper; Lianne Siegel; Emily J Zolfaghari; Thomas A Murray; Victor Vakayil; Adam Sheka; Ruoying Feng; Gabriel Guzman; Samit Sunny Roy; Dhannanjay Muddappa; Michael G Usher; Jeffrey G Chipman; Christopher J Tignanelli; Kathryn M Pendleton Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Anke Wind; Joris van Dijk; Isabelle Nefkens; Wineke van Lent; Péter Nagy; Ernestas Janulionis; Tuula Helander; Francisco Rocha-Goncalves; Wim van Harten Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 2.655