Literature DB >> 24424776

The association of hospital characteristics and quality improvement activities in inpatient medical services.

Joseph D Restuccia1, David Mohr, Mark Meterko, Kelly Stolzmann, Peter Kaboli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of U.S. health care has been the focus of increasing attention, with deficiencies in patient care well recognized and documented. However, relatively little is known about the extent to which hospitals engage in quality improvement activities (QIAs) or factors influencing extent of QIAs.
OBJECTIVE: To identify 1) the extent of QIAs in Veterans Administration (VA) inpatient medical services; and 2) factors associated with widespread adoption of QIAs, in particular use of hospitalists, non-physician providers, and extent of goal alignment between the inpatient service and senior managers on commitment to quality.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study of QIAs using a survey administered to Chiefs of Medicine (COM) at all 124 VA acute care hospitals. We conducted hierarchical regression, regressing QIA use on facility contextual variables, followed by use of hospitalists, non-physician providers, and goal alignment/quality commitment. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome measures pertained to use of a set of 27 QIAs and to three dimensions--infrastructure, prevention, and information gathering--that were identified by factor analysis among the 27 QIAs overall. KEY
RESULTS: Survey response rate was 90 % (111/124). Goal alignment/quality commitment was associated with more widespread use of all four QIA categories [infrastructure (b = 0.42; p < 0.001); prevention (b = 0.24; p < 0.001); information gathering (b = 0.28; p = <0.001); and overall QIA (b = 0.31; p < 0.001)], as was greater use of hospitalists [infrastructure (b = 0.55; p = 0.03); prevention (b = 0.61; p < 0.001); information gathering (b = 0.75; p = 0.01); and overall QIAs (b = 0.61; p < 0.001)]; higher occupancy rate was associated with greater infrastructure QIAs (b = 1.05, p = 0.02). Non-physician provider use, hospital size, university affiliation, and geographic region were not associated with QIAs.
CONCLUSION: As hospitals respond to changes in healthcare (e.g., pay for performance, accountable care organizations), this study suggests that practices such as use of hospitalists and leadership focus on goal alignment/quality commitment may lead to greater implementation of QIAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24424776      PMCID: PMC4000331          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2759-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  38 in total

1.  Implementing quality improvement in hospitals: the role of leadership and culture.

Authors:  V A Parker; W H Wubbenhorst; G J Young; K R Desai; M P Charns
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Jonathan B Perlin; Kenneth W Kizer; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Large employers' new strategies in health care.

Authors:  Robert Galvin; Arnold Milstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Zhonghe Li; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?

Authors:  Lucian L Leape; Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Patient safety: a call to action: a consensus statement from the National Quality Forum.

Authors:  K W Kizer
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-21

9.  The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.

Authors:  Jonathan B Perlin; Robert M Kolodner; Robert H Roswell
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after 'to err is human'.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do we get what we pay for? Transitioning physician payments towards value and efficiency.

Authors:  Malathi Srinivasan; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Factor structure of the Q-LES-Q short form in an enrolled mental health clinic population.

Authors:  Rachel P Riendeau; Jennifer L Sullivan; Mark Meterko; Kelly Stolzmann; Alicia K Williamson; Christopher J Miller; Bo Kim; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.