Literature DB >> 20600198

Differential effects of sucrose and fructose on dietary obesity in four mouse strains.

John I Glendinning1, Lindsey Breinager, Emily Kyrillou, Kristine Lacuna, Rotsen Rocha, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

We examined sugar-induced obesity in mouse strains polymorphic for Tas1r3, a gene that codes for the T1R3 sugar taste receptor. The T1R3 receptor in the FVB and B6 strains has a higher affinity for sugars than that in the AKR and 129P3 strains. In Experiment 1, mice had 40days of access to lab chow plus water, sucrose (10 or 34%), or fructose (10 or 34%) solutions. The strains consumed more of the sucrose than isocaloric fructose solutions. The pattern of strain differences in caloric intake from the 10% sugar solutions was FVB>129P3=B6>AKR; and that from the 34% sugar solutions was FVB>129P3>B6>/=AKR. Despite consuming more sugar calories, the FVB mice resisted obesity altogether. The AKR and 129P3 mice became obese exclusively on the 34% sucrose diet, while the B6 mice did so on the 34% sucrose and 34% fructose diets. In Experiment 2, we compared total caloric intake from diets containing chow versus chow plus 34% sucrose. All strains consumed between 11 and 25% more calories from the sucrose-supplemented diet. In Experiment 3, we compared the oral acceptability of the sucrose and fructose solutions, using lick tests. All strains licked more avidly for the 10% sucrose solutions. The results indicate that in mice (a) Tas1r3 genotype does not predict sugar-induced hyperphagia or obesity; (b) sucrose solutions stimulate higher daily intakes than isocaloric fructose solutions; and (c) susceptibility to sugar-induced obesity varies with strain, sugar concentration and sugar type. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600198      PMCID: PMC2930118          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  82 in total

1.  Distinct contributions of T1R2 and T1R3 taste receptor subunits to the detection of sweet stimuli.

Authors:  Yiling Nie; Stephan Vigues; Jeanette R Hobbs; Graeme L Conn; Steven D Munger
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Consuming fructose-sweetened beverages increases body adiposity in mice.

Authors:  Hella Jürgens; Wiltrud Haass; Tamara R Castañeda; Annette Schürmann; Corinna Koebnick; Frank Dombrowski; Bärbel Otto; Andrea R Nawrocki; Philipp E Scherer; Jochen Spranger; Michael Ristow; Hans-Georg Joost; Peter J Havel; Matthias H Tschöp
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-07

3.  Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake.

Authors:  Sarah R Lewis; Sabrina Ahmed; Cheryl Dym; Eleonora Khaimova; Benjamin Kest; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-08-07

4.  Initial licking responses of mice to sweeteners: effects of tas1r3 polymorphisms.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Susan Chyou; Ivy Lin; Maika Onishi; Puja Patel; Kun Hao Zheng
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Contribution of alpha-gustducin to taste-guided licking responses of mice.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Lauren D Bloom; Maika Onishi; Kun Hao Zheng; Sami Damak; Robert F Margolskee; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity.

Authors:  James A Levine; Lorraine M Lanningham-Foster; Shelly K McCrady; Alisa C Krizan; Leslie R Olson; Paul H Kane; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genetic determinants of energy expenditure and insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity in mice.

Authors:  Katrine Almind; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Phenotypic profile of SWR/J and A/J mice compared to control strains: possible mechanisms underlying resistance to obesity on a high-fat diet.

Authors:  Sarah F Leibowitz; Jesline Alexander; Jordan T Dourmashkin; James O Hill; Ellis C Gayles; Guo-Qing Chang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  NEAT--non-exercise activity thermogenesis--egocentric & geocentric environmental factors vs. biological regulation.

Authors:  J A Levine; C M Kotz
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2005-08
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

2.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

3.  Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-12

4.  The role of T1r3 and Trpm5 in carbohydrate-induced obesity in mice.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Jennifer Gillman; Haley Zamer; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-06-06

5.  Obesogenic diets may differentially alter dopamine control of sucrose and fructose intake in rats.

Authors:  Carolyn E Pritchett; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Host Genetic Background and Gut Microbiota Contribute to Differential Metabolic Responses to Fructose Consumption in Mice.

Authors:  In Sook Ahn; Jennifer M Lang; Christine A Olson; Graciel Diamante; Guanglin Zhang; Zhe Ying; Hyae Ran Byun; Ingrid Cely; Jessica Ding; Peter Cohn; Ira Kurtz; Fernando Gomez-Pinilla; Aldons J Lusis; Elaine Y Hsiao; Xia Yang
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Differential metabolic and multi-tissue transcriptomic responses to fructose consumption among genetically diverse mice.

Authors:  Guanglin Zhang; Hyae Ran Byun; Zhe Ying; Montgomery Blencowe; Yuqi Zhao; Jason Hong; Le Shu; Karthick Chella Krishnan; Fernando Gomez-Pinilla; Xia Yang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.187

10.  Genetic controls of Tas1r3-independent sucrose consumption in mice.

Authors:  Cailu Lin; Michael G Tordoff; Xia Li; Natalia P Bosak; Masashi Inoue; Yutaka Ishiwatari; Longhui Chen; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.