Literature DB >> 20597135

Ohio Appalachian women's perceptions of the cost of cervical cancer screening.

Ann Scheck McAlearney1, Paula H Song, Dale A Rhoda, Cathy Tatum, Stanley Lemeshow, Mack Ruffin, J Phil Harrop, Electra D Paskett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of the importance of cervical cancer screening, screening rates in the United States remain below national prevention goals. Women in the Appalachia Ohio region have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates along with lower cancer screening rates. This study explored the expectations of Appalachian Ohio women with regard to Papanicolaou (Pap) test cost and perceptions of cost as a barrier to screening.
METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 571 women who were part of a multilevel, observational community-based research program in Appalachia Ohio. Eligible women were identified through 14 participating health clinics and asked questions regarding Pap test cost and perceptions of cost as a barrier to screening. Estimates of medical costs were compared with actual costs reported by clinics.
RESULTS: When asked about how much a Pap test would cost, 80% of the women reported they did not know. Among women who reportedly believed they knew the cost, 40% overestimated test cost. Women who noted cost as a barrier were twice as likely to not receive a test within screening guidelines as those who did not perceive a cost barrier. Furthermore, uninsured women were more than 8.5 times as likely to note cost as a barrier than women with private insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: Although underserved women in need of cancer screening commonly report cost as a barrier, the findings of the current study suggest that women may have a very limited and often inaccurate understanding concerning Pap test cost. Providing women with this information may help reduce the impact of this barrier to screening.
© 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20597135      PMCID: PMC3052694          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

1.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Trevor D Thompson; H Irene Hall; Pamela Logan; Robert J Uhler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Geographic disparities in cervical cancer mortality: what are the roles of risk factor prevalence, screening, and use of recommended treatment?

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; William F Lawrence; Jason C King; Patricia Mangan; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Bin Yi; Jon F Kerner; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  L R Chavez; F A Hubbell; S I Mishra; R B Valdez
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Education and income differentials in breast and cervical cancer screening. Policy implications for rural women.

Authors:  P M Lantz; M E Weigers; J S House
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Cancer screening in public health clinics: the importance of clinic utilization.

Authors:  J R Bloom; S L Stewart; J Koo; R A Hiatt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Barriers to cancer screening by rural Appalachian primary care providers.

Authors:  Renee Shell; Fred Tudiver
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.

Authors:  Eugene J Lengerich; Stephen W Wyatt; Angel Rubio; Joyce E Beaulieu; Cathy A Coyne; Linda Fleisher; Ann J Ward; Pamela K Brown
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Patient-perceived barriers to preventive health care among indigent, rural Appalachian patients.

Authors:  D M Elnicki; D K Morris; W T Shockcor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-27
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Radiation therapy resources and guideline-concordant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer patients in an underserved region.

Authors:  Nengliang Yao; Stephen A Matthews; Marianne M Hillemeier; Roger T Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 4.  Cervical cancer screening and psychosocial barriers perceived by patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  Alicja Bukowska-Durawa; Aleksandra Luszczynska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-06-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.