Literature DB >> 9071255

Education and income differentials in breast and cervical cancer screening. Policy implications for rural women.

P M Lantz1, M E Weigers, J S House.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite substantial evidence of socioeconomic differences in the use of breast and cervical cancer screening, the mechanisms explaining these differences, and therefore their policy implications are not well understood. We investigated the way that education and income influence rural women's use of mammograms and Pap tests, including financial barriers to medical care, knowledge and attitudinal barriers, and nonfinancial factors related to health-care access.
METHODS: Data were from a population-based telephone survey of 2,346 rural Wisconsin women aged 40 years and older. Logistic regression analyses and simulation exercises were conducted.
RESULTS: The strongest barriers to screening in this rural population were nonfinancial impediments to access. Removing economic barriers did not lead to significant increases in screening when other types of barriers were present.
CONCLUSIONS: Policies and interventions that focus on the most visible differences that exist between rural women of differing socioeconomic levels (ie, differences in the ability to afford health services) and do not simultaneously address knowledge, attitudinal, and health-care access barriers will fall short of their goal to increase breast and cervical cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9071255     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199703000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  19 in total

1.  Delivering equitable care: comparing preventive services in Manitoba.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Leslie L Roos; Randy Walld; Dawn Traverse; Matthew Dahl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples.

Authors:  Rachel A Crockett; John Weinman; Matthew Hankins; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-03

3.  Knowledge, Awareness and Prevention of Cervical Cancer among Women Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Puducherry, India.

Authors:  Jansirani Siddharthar; Bhuvaneshwari Rajkumar; Kuberan Deivasigamani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Ohio Appalachian women's perceptions of the cost of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Paula H Song; Dale A Rhoda; Cathy Tatum; Stanley Lemeshow; Mack Ruffin; J Phil Harrop; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist.

Authors:  S J Katz; J K Zemencuk; T P Hofer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Consistency in attitudes across cancer screenings in medically underserved minority populations.

Authors:  Susan J Shaw; James Vivian; Kathryn M Orzech; Cristina Huebner Torres; Julie Armin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Assessing Physical Activity Behavior of Cancer Survivors by Race and Social Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Matthew Asare; Scott McIntosh; Eva Culakova; Amina Alio; M Renee Umstattd Meyer; Amber S Kleckner; Georges Adunlin; Ian R Kleckner; Kelly R Ylitalo; Charles S Kamen
Journal:  Int Q Community Health Educ       Date:  2019-06-26

8.  An international comparison of breast cancer survival: Winnipeg, Manitoba and Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Erich Kliewer; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Edwin Y Ng
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Urban/Rural Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Incidence: The Mediating Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Provider Density.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Benmei Liu; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-11-03

10.  Utilization of papanicolaou smears by South Asian women living in the United States.

Authors:  Saima Chaudhry; Arlene Fink; Lillian Gelberg; Robert Brook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.