Literature DB >> 20595964

Chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization to study sister chromatid segregation in vivo.

Ester Falconer1, Elizabeth Chavez, Alexander Henderson, Peter M Lansdorp.   

Abstract

Previously, assays for sister chromatid segregation patterns relied on incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and indirect methods to infer segregation patterns after two cell divisions. In this study, we describe a method to differentially label sister chromatids of mouse cells and to directly assay sister chromatid segregation patterns after one cell division in vitro and in vivo by adaptation of the well-established CO-FISH technique. BrdU is incorporated into newly formed DNA strands, which are then subjected to photolysis and exonuclease digestion to create single-stranded sister chromatids containing parental template DNA only. Such single-stranded sister chromatids are differentially labeled using unidirectional probes to major satellite sequences coupled to fluorescent markers. Differentially labeled sister chromatids in postmitotic cells are visualized using fluorescence microscopy, and sister chromatid segregation patterns can be directly assayed after one cell division. This procedure requires 4 d for in vivo mouse tissues and 2 d for in vitro-cultured cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595964      PMCID: PMC3771506          DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  24 in total

Review 1.  ES cell-mediated conditional transgenesis.

Authors:  M Gertsenstein; C Lobe; A Nagy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2002

2.  Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens.

Authors:  J W Allen; S A Latt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction.

Authors:  Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Immortal strands? Give me a break.

Authors:  Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Centric fusion, satellite DNA, and DNA polarity in mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  M S Lin; R L Davidson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Elizabeth A Chavez; Alexander Henderson; Steven S S Poon; Steven McKinney; Lindsay Brown; David G Huntsman; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Somatic stem cells and the kinetics of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  John Cairns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Strand-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization: the CO-FISH family.

Authors:  S M Bailey; E H Goodwin; M N Cornforth
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  Pericentromeric organization at the fusion point of mouse Robertsonian translocation chromosomes.

Authors:  S Garagna; N Marziliano; M Zuccotti; J B Searle; E Capanna; C A Redi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  New staining method for the detection of sister-chromatid exchanges in BrdU-labelled chromosomes.

Authors:  P Alves; J Jonasson
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  9 in total

1.  Single-cell template strand sequencing by Strand-seq enables the characterization of individual homologs.

Authors:  Ashley D Sanders; Ester Falconer; Mark Hills; Diana C J Spierings; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Evolution of the structure and composition of house mouse satellite DNA sequences in the subgenus Mus (Rodentia: Muridea): a cytogenomic approach.

Authors:  B Cazaux; J Catalan; F Justy; C Escudé; E Desmarais; J Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  A Novel Class of Human Cardiac Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiziano Moccetti; Annarosa Leri; Polina Goichberg; Marcello Rota; Piero Anversa
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  A CO-FISH assay to assess sister chromatid segregation patterns in mitosis of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Stephan Sauer; Sandra S Burkett; Mark Lewandoski; Amar J S Klar
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 5.  Balancing self-renewal against genome preservation in stem cells: How do they manage to have the cake and eat it too?

Authors:  Robert Y L Tsai
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  Tracking chromatid segregation to identify human cardiac stem cells that regenerate extensively the infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Jan Kajstura; Yingnan Bai; Donato Cappetta; Junghyun Kim; Christian Arranto; Fumihiro Sanada; Domenico D'Amario; Alex Matsuda; Silvana Bardelli; João Ferreira-Martins; Toru Hosoda; Annarosa Leri; Marcello Rota; Joseph Loscalzo; Piero Anversa
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation.

Authors:  Falong Lu; Yuting Liu; Lan Jiang; Shinpei Yamaguchi; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Cosegregation of asymmetric features during cell division.

Authors:  Silje Anda; Erik Boye; Kay Oliver Schink; Beata Grallert
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.