Literature DB >> 23681662

A CO-FISH assay to assess sister chromatid segregation patterns in mitosis of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Stephan Sauer1, Sandra S Burkett, Mark Lewandoski, Amar J S Klar.   

Abstract

Sister chromatids contain identical DNA sequence but are chiral with respect to both their helical handedness and their replication history. Emerging evidence from various model organisms suggests that certain stem cells segregate sister chromatids nonrandomly to either maintain genome integrity or to bias cellular differentiation in asymmetric cell divisions. Conventional methods for tracing of old vs. newly synthesized DNA strands generally lack resolution for individual chromosomes and employ halogenated thymidine analogs with profound cytotoxic effects on rapidly dividing cells. Here, we present a modified chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization (CO-FISH) assay, where identification of individual chromosomes and their replication history is achieved in subsequent hybridization steps with chromosome-specific DNA probes and PNA telomere probes. Importantly, we tackle the issue of BrdU cytotoxicity and show that our method is compatible with normal mouse ES cell biology, unlike a recently published related protocol. Results from our CO-FISH assay show that mitotic segregation of mouse chromosome 7 is random in ES cells, which contrasts previously published results from our laboratory and settles a controversy. Our straightforward protocol represents a useful resource for future studies on chromatid segregation patterns of in vitro-cultured cells from distinct model organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681662      PMCID: PMC6959521          DOI: 10.1007/s10577-013-9358-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  34 in total

1.  Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing.

Authors:  O Henegariu; N A Heerema; L Lowe Wright; P Bray-Ward; D C Ward; G H Vance
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2001-02-01

2.  Two types of precursor cells in a multipotential hematopoietic cell line.

Authors:  Zhi-jia Ye; Yuval Kluger; Zheng Lian; Sherman M Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization to study sister chromatid segregation in vivo.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Elizabeth Chavez; Alexander Henderson; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Induction of a deoxycytidineless state in cultured mammalian cells by bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  M Meuth; H Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  A model for specification of the left-right axis in vertebrates.

Authors:  A J Klar
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Microenvironmental modulation of asymmetric cell division in human lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Sharon R Pine; Bríd M Ryan; Lyuba Varticovski; Ana I Robles; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A hypothesis for how chromosome 11 translocations cause psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Gurjeet Singh; Amar J S Klar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Bromodeoxyuridine mutagenesis in mammalian cells is related to deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalance.

Authors:  C R Ashman; R L Davidson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  A PiggyBac-based recessive screening method to identify pluripotency regulators.

Authors:  Ge Guo; Yue Huang; Peter Humphreys; Xiaozhong Wang; Austin Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Ornella Barrandon; Jennifer Nichols; Jitsutaro Kawaguchi; Thorold W Theunissen; Austin Smith
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  DNA asymmetry in stem cells - immortal or mortal?

Authors:  Swathi Yadlapalli; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Asymmetric Centromeres Differentially Coordinate with Mitotic Machinery to Ensure Biased Sister Chromatid Segregation in Germline Stem Cells.

Authors:  Rajesh Ranjan; Jonathan Snedeker; Xin Chen
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Visualization of Telomere Integrity and Function In Vitro and In Vivo Using Immunofluorescence Techniques.

Authors:  Anthony J Cesare; Christopher M Heaphy; Roderick J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  Symmetry from Asymmetry or Asymmetry from Symmetry?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Kahney; Rajesh Ranjan; Ryan J Gleason; Xin Chen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2018-01-18

5.  DNA methyltransferase-3-dependent nonrandom template segregation in differentiating embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Christian Elabd; Wendy Cousin; Robert Y Chen; Marc S Chooljian; Joey T Pham; Irina M Conboy; Michael J Conboy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Nonrandom template segregation: a way to break the symmetry of stem cells.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Coordinated niche-associated signals promote germline homeostasis in the Drosophila ovary.

Authors:  Zhong Liu; Guohua Zhong; Phing Chian Chai; Lichao Luo; Sen Liu; Ying Yang; Gyeong-Hun Baeg; Yu Cai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 10.539

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.