Literature DB >> 20590723

Brain activation during upright and inverted encoding of own- and other-age faces: ERP evidence for an own-age bias.

Annika Melinder1, Gustaf Gredebäck, Alissa Westerlund, Charles A Nelson.   

Abstract

We investigated the neural processing underlying own-age versus other-age faces among 5-year-old children and adults, as well as the effect of orientation on face processing. Upright and inverted faces of 5-year-old children, adults, and elderly adults (> 75 years of age) were presented to participants while ERPs and eye tracking patterns were recorded concurrently. We found evidence for an own-age bias in children, as well as for predicted delayed latencies and larger amplitudes for inverted faces, which replicates earlier findings. Finally, we extend recent reports about an expert-sensitive component (P2) to other-race faces to account for similar effects in regard to other-age faces. We conclude that differences in neural activity are strongly related to the amount and quality of experience that participants have with faces of various ages. Effects of orientation are discussed in relation to the holistic hypothesis and recent data that compromise this view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590723      PMCID: PMC2898522          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00910.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  29 in total

1.  Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants.

Authors:  M de Haan; C A Nelson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Perceptual priming for upright and inverted faces in infants and adults.

Authors:  S J Webb; C A Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2001-05

3.  Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-04

Review 4.  The faces of development: a review of early face processing over childhood.

Authors:  M J Taylor; M Batty; R J Itier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Developmental asymmetries between horizontal and vertical tracking.

Authors:  Helena Grönqvist; Gustaf Gredebäck; Claes von Hofsten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition.

Authors:  Michael J Bernstein; Steven G Young; Kurt Hugenberg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-08

7.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Johanna Stahl; Holger Wiese; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Plasticity of face processing in infancy.

Authors:  O Pascalis; L S Scott; D J Kelly; R W Shannon; E Nicholson; M Coleman; C A Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Effects of repetition and configural changes on the development of face recognition processes.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  The neural correlates of processing newborn and adult faces in 3-year-old children.

Authors:  Stefanie Peykarjou; Alissa Westerlund; Viola Macchi Cassia; Dana Kuefner; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Suyong Yang; Shiyue Sun; Chao Liu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Emotion identification across adulthood using the Dynamic FACES database of emotional expressions in younger, middle aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Catherine A C Holland; Natalie C Ebner; Tian Lin; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-03-29

4.  Children's neural response to contrast-negated faces is species specific.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-12-03

5.  Do neural correlates of face expertise vary with task demands? Event-related potential correlates of own- and other-race face inversion.

Authors:  Holger Wiese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Perceptual narrowing towards adult faces is a cross-cultural phenomenon in infancy: a behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy study with Japanese infants.

Authors:  Megumi Kobayashi; Viola Macchi Cassia; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-12-05

7.  Tracking developmental differences in real-world social attention across adolescence, young adulthood and older adulthood.

Authors:  Martina De Lillo; Rebecca Foley; Matthew C Fysh; Aimée Stimson; Elisabeth E F Bradford; Camilla Woodrow-Hill; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  Different neural processes accompany self-recognition in photographs across the lifespan: an ERP study using dizygotic twins.

Authors:  David L Butler; Jason B Mattingley; Ross Cunnington; Thomas Suddendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity.

Authors:  Andria Shimi; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Heather J Ferguson; Victoria E A Brunsdon; Elisabeth E F Bradford
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.