Literature DB >> 17680942

The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition.

Michael J Bernstein1, Steven G Young, Kurt Hugenberg.   

Abstract

Although the cross-race effect (CRE) is a well-established phenomenon, both perceptual-expertise and social-categorization models have been proposed to explain the effect. The two studies reported here investigated the extent to which categorizing other people as in-group versus out-group members is sufficient to elicit a pattern of face recognition analogous to that of the CRE, even when perceptual expertise with the stimuli is held constant. In Study 1, targets were categorized as members of real-life in-groups and out-groups (based on university affiliation), whereas in Study 2, targets were categorized into experimentally created minimal groups. In both studies, recognition performance was better for targets categorized as in-group members, despite the fact that perceptual expertise was equivalent for in-group and out-group faces. These results suggest that social-cognitive mechanisms of in-group and out-group categorization are sufficient to elicit performance differences for in-group and out-group face recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680942     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  70 in total

1.  Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition.

Authors:  Michael R Ho; Kathy Pezdek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of Minimal Grouping On Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations.

Authors:  Jeremy C Simon; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2019-05-06

4.  Inconsistent individual personality description eliminates the other-race effect.

Authors:  Lanya Zhang; Guomei Zhou; Xiaoping Pu; William G Hayward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

5.  The effect of emotional valence and age of faces on adults and children's inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Xiuying Wei; Hui Zhang; Jiangbo Hu; Jinya Xu; Jiale Wang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Shkurko
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Visual scanning and recognition of Chinese, Caucasian, and racially ambiguous faces: contributions from bottom-up facial physiognomic information and top-down knowledge of racial categories.

Authors:  Qiandong Wang; Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Chao S Hu; Miao Qian; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Attentional prioritization of infant faces is limited to own-race infants.

Authors:  John Hodsoll; Kimberly A Quinn; Sara Hodsoll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The composite task reveals stronger holistic processing in children than adults for child faces.

Authors:  Tirta Susilo; Kate Crookes; Elinor McKone; Hannah Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.