Literature DB >> 24257431

Robotic ultrasound and needle guidance for prostate cancer management: review of the contemporary literature.

Deborah R Kaye1, Dan Stoianovici, Misop Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the recent advances in needle guidance and robotic ultrasound technology which are used for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and management. RECENT
FINDINGS: Prostate biopsy technology has remained relatively unchanged. Improved needle localization and precision would allow for better management of this common disease. Robotic ultrasound and needle guidance is one strategy to improve needle localization and diagnostic accuracy of PCa. This review focuses on the recent advances in robotic ultrasound and needle guidance technologies, and their potential impact on PCa diagnosis and management.
SUMMARY: The use of robotic ultrasound and robotic-assisted needle guidance has the potential to improve PCa diagnosis and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24257431      PMCID: PMC4000157          DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  41 in total

1.  Robotic transperineal prostate biopsy: pilot clinical study.

Authors:  H Ho; J S P Yuen; P Mohan; E W Lim; C W S Cheng
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Observations on rotating needle insertions using a brachytherapy robot.

Authors:  M A Meltsner; N J Ferrier; B R Thomadsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Saturation biopsy of the prostate: why saturation does not saturate.

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe di Lorenzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prostate rebiopsy is a poor surrogate of treatment efficacy in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Svetec; K McCabe; S Peretsman; E Klein; H Levin; S Optenberg; I Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Tharindu De Silva; Aaron Fenster; Derek W Cool; Lori Gardi; Cesare Romagnoli; Jagath Samarabandu; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Using manual prostate contours to enhance deformable registration of endorectal MRI.

Authors:  M R Cheung; K Krishnan
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Real-time co-registration using novel ultrasound technology: ex vivo validation and in vivo applications.

Authors:  Eric Y Yang; Venkateshwar R Polsani; Michael J Washburn; William Zang; Anne L Hall; Salim S Virani; Megan D Hodge; Dan Parker; William S Kerwin; Gerald M Lawrie; Zsolt Garami; Christie M Ballantyne; Joel D Morrisett; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Misop Han; Doyoung Chang; Chunwoo Kim; Brian J Lee; Yihe Zuo; Hyung-Joo Kim; Doru Petrisor; Bruce Trock; Alan W Partin; Ronald Rodriguez; H Ballentine Carter; Mohamad Allaf; Jongwon Kim; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Documenting the location of systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: correlation with multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Yuxi Pang; Vijay Shah; Marcelino Bernardo; Angelo Baccala; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Compton Benjamin; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.

Authors:  N Westhoff; F P Siegel; D Hausmann; M Polednik; J von Hardenberg; M S Michel; M Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy.

Authors:  Sascha Kaufmann; Giorgio I Russo; Fabian Bamberg; Lorenz Löwe; Giuseppe Morgia; Konstantin Nikolaou; Arnulf Stenzl; Stephan Kruck; Jens Bedke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Intelligent magnetic manipulation for gastrointestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph C Norton; Piotr R Slawinski; Holly S Lay; James W Martin; Benjamin F Cox; Gerard Cummins; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Richard E Clutton; Keith L Obstein; Sandy Cochran; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-06-19

5.  A prospective analysis of robotic targeted MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy using the centroid targeting approach.

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Pol Servian; Amit Patel; Catherine Lovegrove; Lindsey Skelton; Taimur T Shah; David Eldred-Evans; Manit Arya; Henry Tam; Hashim U Ahmed; Mathias Winkler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 6.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique.

Authors:  Alice Thomson; Mo Li; Jeremy Grummet; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

7.  Brachytherapy next generation: robotic systems.

Authors:  Tiberiu Popescu; Alex Cristian Kacsó; Doina Pisla; Gabriel Kacsó
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.