Literature DB >> 24509182

Imaging and pathology findings after an initial negative MRI-US fusion-guided and 12-core extended sextant prostate biopsy session.

Cheng William Hong1, Annerleim Walton-Diaz, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Anthony N Hoang, Barış Türkbey, Lambros Stamatakis, Sheng Xu, Hayet Amalou, M Minhaj Siddiqui, Jeffrey W Nix, Srinivas Vourganti, Maria J Merino, Peter L Choyke, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasonography (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsy increases detection rates compared to an extended sextant biopsy. The imaging characteristics and pathology outcomes of subsequent biopsies in patients with initially negative MRI-US fusion biopsies are described in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 855 biopsy sessions of 751 patients (June 2007 to March 2013). The fusion biopsy consisted of two cores per lesion identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and a 12-core extended sextant transrectal US (TRUS) biopsy. Inclusion criteria were at least two fusion biopsy sessions, with a negative first biopsy and mpMRI before each.
RESULTS: The detection rate on the initial fusion biopsy was 55.3%; 336 patients had negative findings. Forty-one patients had follow-up fusion biopsies, but only 34 of these were preceded by a repeat mpMRI. The median interval between biopsies was 15 months. Fourteen patients (41%) were positive for cancer on the repeat MRI-US fusion biopsy. Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, digital rectal exam findings, lesion diameter, and changes on imaging were comparable between patients with negative and positive rebiopsies. Of the patients with positive rebiopsies, 79% had a positive TRUS biopsy before referral (P = 0.004). Ten patients had Gleason 3+3 disease, three had 3+4 disease, and one had 4+4 disease.
CONCLUSION: In patients with a negative MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy and indications for repeat biopsy, the detection rate of the follow-up sessions was lower than the initial detection rate. Of the prostate cancers subsequently found, 93% were low grade (≤ 3+4). In this low risk group of patients, increasing the follow-up time interval should be considered in the appropriate clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509182      PMCID: PMC4289157          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.13345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  23 in total

1.  Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting and monitoring cancer: a review of current applications in body imaging.

Authors:  Barış Türkbey; Ömer Aras; Nevzat Karabulut; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Erhan Akpinar; Sedat Alibek; Yuxi Pang; Şükrü Mehmet Ertürk; Riham H El Khouli; David A Bluemke; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era.

Authors:  Barış Türkbey; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Vijay P Shah; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Angelo A Baccala; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Maria J Merino; Joanna H Shih; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The impact of prostate biopsy on urinary symptoms, erectile function, and anxiety.

Authors:  Alexander P Glaser; Kristian Novakovic; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J A Margolis; Malu MacAiran; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies.

Authors:  Srinivas Vourganti; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Nitin Yerram; Jeffrey Nix; Dmitry Volkin; An Hoang; Baris Turkbey; Gopal N Gupta; Jochen Kruecker; W Marston Linehan; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.

Authors:  Raju Chelluri; Amichai Kilchevsky; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Thomas P Frye; Daniel Su; Michele Fascelli; Richard Ho; Steven F Abboud; Baris Turkbey; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Histologic findings associated with false-positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging performed for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Jennifer B Gordetsky; David Ullman; Luciana Schultz; Kristin K Porter; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena; Carli E Calderone; Jeffrey W Nix; Michael Ullman; Sejong Bae; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion.

Authors:  Nathan Bockholt; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Co-registration of MRI and ultrasound: accuracy of targeting based on radiology-pathology correlation.

Authors:  Win Shun Lai; Jessica G Zarzour; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.