Literature DB >> 20585867

Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the number and size of analyzed lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.

Elfriede Bollschweiler1, Sarah Besch, Uta Drebber, Wolfgang Schröder, Stefan P Mönig, Daniel Vallböhmer, Stephan E Baldus, Ralf Metzger, Arnulf H Hölscher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that along with primary tumor response, lymph node status after RTx/CTx is one of the most important prognostic factors for advanced esophageal carcinoma. The goal of our study was to investigate the influence of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RTx/CTx) on lymph nodes (LN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1997 until 2006, 297 patients underwent surgery for advanced esophageal carcinoma. Of these, 192 received preoperative chemoradiation (5-FU, cisplatin, 36 Gy). The following matched subgroups were chosen: Group I, 20 with surgery alone: 10 adenocarcinoma (AC), 10 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); Group II, 20 with minor response (10 AC, 10 SCC); Group III, 20 with major response (10 AC, 10 SCC). Tumor response was graded as "minor" or "major" according to the Cologne Regression Scale, the LN size determined by the largest measured diameter.
RESULTS: A total of 1967 LNs from 60 patients were examined. Of these, 161 LNs showed metastasis. The median number of LNs examined per patient was not significantly higher in group I compared with the group with pretreatment (32 vs 31). Group I and group II showed LN metastasis (LNM) in 65% of cases, and group III in only 20% (p = 0.011). LNMs after pretreatment had significantly smaller median diameters (5.0 mm) than those without (7.0 mm) (p < 0.02). Nonmetastatic LN size did not vary between the three groups. LN size with and without metastasis did not differ between AC and SCC or between major and minor responders.
CONCLUSION: With good response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, the size and the number of metastatic LNs is significantly reduced regardless of histologic cancer type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585867     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1196-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Comparative Quantitative Lymph Node Assessment in Localized Esophageal Cancer Patients After R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Michael J Pucci; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans; Hanna Meidl; Casey Lamb; Daniel Levine; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Preoperative chemoradiation therapy decreases the number of lymph nodes resected during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Adamu Issaka; Nezih Onur Ermerak; Zeynep Bilgi; Volkan Hasan Kara; Cigdem Ataizi Celikel; Hasan Fevzi Batirel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prognostic relevance of tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Siewert III adenocarcinoma: treatment update.

Authors:  Alberto Di Leo; Andrea Zanoni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Lymph Node Harvest During Esophagectomy Is Not Influenced by Use of Neoadjuvant Therapy or Clinical Disease Stage.

Authors:  Renato A Luna; James P Dolan; Brian S Diggs; Nathan W Bronson; Brett C Sheppard; Paul H Schipper; Brandon H Tieu; Benjamin T Feeney; Ken M Gatter; Gina M Vaccaro; Charles R Thomas; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Clinical Significance of the Pre-therapeutic Nodal Size in Patients Undergoing Neo-Adjuvant Treatment Followed by Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shinji Mine; Masayuki Watanabe; Yu Imamura; Akihiko Okamura; Takanori Kurogochi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Extent of lymphadenectomy does not predict survival in patients treated with primary esophagectomy.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Jill Weber; Khaldoun Almhanna; Sarah Hoffe; Ravi Shridhar; Richard Karl; Kenneth L Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A nomogram associated with high probability of malignant nodes in the surgical specimen after trimodality therapy of patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Hayashi; Lianchun Xiao; Akihiro Suzuki; Mariela A Blum; Bradley Sabloff; Takashi Taketa; Dipen M Maru; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Brian Weston; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Lymph node metastasis is not associated with survival in patients with clinical stage T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Liqiong Zhu; Zongxing Zhao; Ao Liu; Xin Wang; Xiaotao Geng; Yu Nie; Fen Zhao; Minghuan Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.