Literature DB >> 28664255

Comparative Quantitative Lymph Node Assessment in Localized Esophageal Cancer Patients After R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

Danica N Giugliano1, Adam C Berger2, Michael J Pucci2, Ernest L Rosato2, Nathaniel R Evans2, Hanna Meidl2, Casey Lamb2, Daniel Levine2, Francesco Palazzo2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy on lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer are unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify lymph node retrieval after R0 esophagectomy and to assess its impact on overall survival in induction therapy patients.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-four consecutive patients underwent esophagectomy with or without induction therapy from 2008 to 2015 for esophageal cancer. Total lymph nodes, positive lymph nodes, and lymph node ratios were compared between two groups of patients: those treated with either upfront surgery or those treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery. Comparisons were made using Student's t test. Overall survival was obtained and compared using Kaplan Meier survival curves.
RESULTS: Total lymph node counts were less in the induction therapy group (p = 0.027), while positive lymph node counts and lymph node ratios did not differ between groups (p = 0.262 and p = 0.310, respectively). In the neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery group, overall survival was significantly shorter for patients who had any positive lymph nodes in the pathologic specimen (p = 0.0065).
CONCLUSIONS: Total lymph node counts were significantly lower in the induction therapy group, while positive lymph node counts and lymph node ratios did not differ from the upfront surgery group. Although overall survival was not different between groups, it was decreased within the induction therapy cohort among those who had any positive lymph nodes retrieved at surgery. This study confirms that unstratified gross lymph node counts do not substantially relate to prognosis in the heterogeneous population of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients who may or may not have had neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Lymphadenectomy; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664255     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3478-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  34 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho-Young Lee; Hong-Jo Choi; Ki-Jae Park; Jong-Sok Shin; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; Mee-Sook Roh; Choongrak Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Lymph Node Status After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Implications for the Extent of Lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  William B Robb; Emilie Maillard; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the number and size of analyzed lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Sarah Besch; Uta Drebber; Wolfgang Schröder; Stefan P Mönig; Daniel Vallböhmer; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Adam C Berger; Aaron Bloomenthal; Benny Weksler; Nathaniel Evans; Karen A Chojnacki; Charles J Yeo; Ernest L Rosato
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Classification of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal and junctional cancer: assessment of existing measures and proposal of a novel 3-point standard.

Authors:  Claire L Donohoe; Naoimh J O'Farrell; Tim Grant; Sinead King; Lindsey Clarke; Cian Muldoon; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases and ratio in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Wilson; Ernest L Rosato; Karen A Chojnacki; Inna Chervoneva; John C Kairys; Herbert E Cohn; Francis E Rosato; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Guillaume Piessen; Nicolas Briez; Jean Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is it time for a new TNM classification in esophageal carcinoma?

Authors:  Dean Bogoevski; Florian Onken; Alexandra Koenig; Jussuf T Kaifi; Paulus Schurr; Guido Sauter; Jakob R Izbicki; Emre F Yekebas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas W Rice; Long-Qi Chen; Paul H Schipper; Kenneth A Kesler; Simon Law; Toni E M R Lerut; Carolyn E Reed; Jarmo A Salo; Walter J Scott; Wayne L Hofstetter; Thomas J Watson; Mark S Allen; Valerie W Rusch; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Ratios of involved nodes in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Claire Verschraegen; Donald I Promish; Gábor Cserni; Jan Van de Steene; Patricia Tai; Georges Vlastos; Mia Voordeckers; Guy Storme; Melanie Royce
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of Total Number of Lymph Node Retrieval on Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma Deserves Additional Investigation.

Authors:  Hanlu Zhang; Yushang Yang; Wenping Wang; Yong Yuan; Yun Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Value of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Siva Raja; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Usman Ahmad; Marie E Semple; Eugene H Blackstone; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The Least Nodal Disease Burden Defines the Minimum Number of Nodes Retrieved for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hanlu Zhang; Xiuji Yan; Yu-Shang Yang; Hong Yang; Yong Yuan; Dong Tian; Yin Li; Zhi-Yong Wu; Yun Wang; Jian-Hua Fu; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  A modified survival model for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on lymph nodes: A study based on SEER database and external validation.

Authors:  Tianbao Yang; Shijie Huang; Boyang Chen; Yahua Chen; Wei Liang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.