Literature DB >> 20585442

The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.

Krzysztof W Fornalski1, Ludwik Dobrzyński.   

Abstract

The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-effect relationship has been consistently used by most radiation epidemiologists to estimate cancer mortality risk. The large scattering of data by International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC (Vrijheid et al. 2007; Therry-Chef et al. 2007; Cardis et al. 2007), interpreted in accordance with LNT, has been previously demonstrated (Fornalski and Dobrzyński 2009). Using conventional and Bayesian methods the present paper demonstrates that the standard mortality ratios (SMRs), lower in the IARC cohort of exposed nuclear workers than in the non exposed group, should be considered as a hormetic effect, rather than a healthy worker effect (HWE) as claimed by the IARC group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; dose-response; healthy worker effect; hormesis; low radiation; nuclear industry workers

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585442      PMCID: PMC2889508          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-019.Fornalski

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  44 in total

1.  Healthy worker effect.

Authors:  Dave McGeoghegan
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk Among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: design, epidemiological methods and descriptive results.

Authors:  M Vrijheid; E Cardis; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; Y-O Ahn; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; H Engels; G Gulis; R R Habib; Y Hosoda; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Moser; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Zombie science: a sinister consequence of evaluating scientific theories purely on the basis of enlightened self-interest.

Authors:  Bruce G Charlton
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  The many faces of tumor dormancy.

Authors:  Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.205

5.  The influence of study characteristics on the healthy worker effect: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  R Chen; A Seaton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Suppressive effect of low dose total body irradiation on lung metastasis: dose dependency and effective period.

Authors:  Y Hosoi; K Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 7.  The evolving concept of the healthy worker survivor effect.

Authors:  H M Arrighi; I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Is there a healthy worker effect for cancer incidence among women in Sweden?

Authors:  G Gridley; O Nyren; M Dosemeci; T Moradi; H O Adami; L Carroll; S H Zahm
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Mortality and cancer registration experience of the Sellafield employees known to have been involved in the 1957 Windscale accident.

Authors:  D McGeoghegan; K Binks
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.394

10.  Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; E S Gilbert; L Carpenter; G Howe; I Kato; B K Armstrong; V Beral; G Cowper; A Douglas; J Fix
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  10 in total

1.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT.

Authors:  Zbigniew Jaworowski
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Residential radon appears to prevent lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Yehoshua Socol; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Mohan Doss; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Marek K Janiak; Mark L Miller; Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott; Brant Ulsh; Alexander Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Quantification of the healthy worker effect: a nationwide cohort study among electricians in Denmark.

Authors:  Lau C Thygesen; Ulla A Hvidtfeldt; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Cancer risk in diagnostic radiation workers in Korea from 1996–2002.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwa Choi; Mina Ha; Won Jin Lee; Seung-Sik Hwang; Meeseon Jeong; Young-Woo Jin; Hyeog Ju Kim; Kwang-Yong Lee; Jung-Eun Lee; Jong-Won Kang; Heon Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Healthy Worker Effect Phenomenon: Revisited with Emphasis on Statistical Methods - A Review.

Authors:  Ritam Chowdhury; Divyang Shah; Abhishek R Payal
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr

10.  Effect of Work-Family Conflict, Psychological Job Demand, and Job Control on the Health Status of Nurses.

Authors:  Li-Chung Pien; Wan-Ju Cheng; Kuei-Ru Chou; Li-Chiu Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.