Literature DB >> 20585443

Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT.

Zbigniew Jaworowski1.   

Abstract

The Chernobyl accident was probably the worst possible catastrophe of a nuclear power station. It was the only such catastrophe since the advent of nuclear power 55 years ago. It resulted in a total meltdown of the reactor core, a vast emission of radionuclides, and early deaths of only 31 persons. Its enormous political, economic, social and psychological impact was mainly due to deeply rooted fear of radiation induced by the linear non-threshold hypothesis (LNT) assumption. It was a historic event that provided invaluable lessons for nuclear industry and risk philosophy. One of them is demonstration that counted per electricity units produced, early Chernobyl fatalities amounted to 0.86 death/GWe-year), and they were 47 times lower than from hydroelectric stations ( approximately 40 deaths/GWe-year). The accident demonstrated that using the LNT assumption as a basis for protection measures and radiation dose limitations was counterproductive, and lead to sufferings and pauperization of millions of inhabitants of contaminated areas. The projections of thousands of late cancer deaths based on LNT, are in conflict with observations that in comparison with general population of Russia, a 15% to 30% deficit of solid cancer mortality was found among the Russian emergency workers, and a 5% deficit solid cancer incidence among the population of most contaminated areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chernobyl; LNT; health effects; irradiation; remedial measures; social consequences

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585443      PMCID: PMC2889503          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-029.Jaworowski

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  32 in total

1.  Thyroid cancer incidence.

Authors:  E Ron; J Lubin; A B Schneider
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cancer risks in a population with prolonged low dose-rate gamma-radiation exposure in radiocontaminated buildings, 1983-2002.

Authors:  S-L Hwang; H-R Guo; W-A Hsieh; J-S Hwang; S-D Lee; J-L Tang; C-C Chen; T-C Chang; J-D Wang; W P Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Epidemiological investigation of radiological effects in high background radiation areas of Yangjiang, China.

Authors:  L X Wei; Y R Zha; Z F Tao; W H He; D Q Chen; Y L Yuan
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A "normal" finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study.

Authors:  H R Harach; K O Franssila; V M Wasenius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Hormesis and radiation protection.

Authors:  E W Webster
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Protection of the public in the event of major radiation accidents: principles for planning. A report of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1984

7.  Risk of thyroid cancer after exposure to 131I in childhood.

Authors:  Elisabeth Cardis; Ausrele Kesminiene; Victor Ivanov; Irina Malakhova; Yoshisada Shibata; Valeryi Khrouch; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Evaldas Maceika; Irina Zvonova; Oleg Vlassov; André Bouville; Guennadi Goulko; Masaharu Hoshi; Alexander Abrosimov; Jadvyga Anoshko; Larisa Astakhova; Sergey Chekin; Evgenyi Demidchik; Rosaria Galanti; Masahiro Ito; Elena Korobova; Evgenyi Lushnikov; Marat Maksioutov; Vladimir Masyakin; Alexander Nerovnia; Vladimir Parshin; Evgenyi Parshkov; Nikolay Piliptsevich; Aldo Pinchera; Semyon Polyakov; Nina Shabeka; Eero Suonio; Vanessa Tenet; Anatoli Tsyb; Shunichi Yamashita; Dillwyn Williams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897-1997.

Authors:  A Berrington; S C Darby; H A Weiss; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklöf; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Thyroid cancer incidence among people living in areas contaminated by radiation from the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Elaine Ron
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  20 in total

1.  Improving the scientific foundations for estimating health risks from the Fukushima incident.

Authors:  Edward Calabrese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thyroid cancer after chernobyl: obfuscated truth.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  On the radiation-leukemia dose-response relationship among recovery workers after the chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Regulatory-Science: Biphasic Cancer Models or the LNT-Not Just a Matter of Biology!

Authors:  Paolo F Ricci; Ian R Sammis
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Long-Term Consequences of the Chernobyl Radioactive Fallout: An Exploration of the Aggregate Data.

Authors:  Francesca Marino; Luca Nunziata
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl: mechanisms of overestimation.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Editorial: is airport body-scan radiation a health risk?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  French nuclear power plants and childhood leukemia.

Authors:  Krzysztof W Fornalski; Mervyn Cohen; Jerry M Cuttler; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Mohan Doss; Vincent J Esposito; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Alan Fellman; Mark L Miller; Jane Orient; Charles W Pennington; Kanokporn N Rithidech; Bill Sacks; Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott; Jeffry A Siegel; Yehoshua Socol; James Welsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.