Literature DB >> 10361606

Is there a healthy worker effect for cancer incidence among women in Sweden?

G Gridley1, O Nyren, M Dosemeci, T Moradi, H O Adami, L Carroll, S H Zahm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate whether there is a healthy worker effect (HWE) for cancer incidence among women. HWE is a bias found in occupational studies that compare rates of disease among employed people to disease rates for the general population, which includes unemployed people (who may be less healthy than those who are employed).
METHODS: Data from the 1960 and 1970 Swedish censuses were used to identify all 1,659,940 Swedish women who were employed in either year. They were followed during 1971-1989 through linkages to the national cancer and death registers. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed comparing employed women to the 1,627,873 women who were not employed in either 1960 or 1970.
RESULTS: For the 545,857 women employed in both 1960 and 1970, the SIR for all cancers combined was 1.05 (1.04-1.06). When specific cancer sites were analyzed separately, the highest cancer risks were for cancers of the lung and bladder (SIR = 1.2) and reproductive organs (breast, ovary, endometrium, and cervix SIR = 1.1). Overall cancer risks were highest among full-time workers, younger workers, urban workers, and workers with the highest socioeconomic status (based on the woman's job title).
CONCLUSIONS: These results show no general HWE for cancer incidence among employed Swedish women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10361606     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199907)36:1<193::aid-ajim27>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  5 in total

1.  The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Krzysztof W Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

3.  Ethylene oxide and risk of lympho-hematopoietic cancer and breast cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gary M Marsh; Kara A Keeton; Alexander S Riordan; Elizabeth A Best; Stacey M Benson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Occupation related pesticide exposure and cancer of the prostate: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Van Maele-Fabry; J L Willems
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Shared occupational risks for transitional cell cancer of the bladder and renal pelvis among men and women in Sweden.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Mark Donahue; Gloria Gridley; Johanna Adami; Laure El Ghormli; Mustafa Dosemeci
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.