Literature DB >> 7724726

Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries.

E Cardis1, E S Gilbert, L Carpenter, G Howe, I Kato, B K Armstrong, V Beral, G Cowper, A Douglas, J Fix.   

Abstract

Studies of the mortality among nuclear industry workforces have been carried out, and nationally combined analyses performed, in the U.S., the UK and Canada. This paper presents the results of internationally combined analyses of mortality data on 95,673 workers (85.4% men) monitored for external exposure to ionizing radiation and employed for 6 months or longer in the nuclear industry of one of the three countries. These analyses were undertaken to obtain a more precise direct assessment of the carcinogenic effects of protracted low-level exposure to external, predominantly gamma, radiation. The combination of the data from the various studies increases the power to study associations between radiation and specific cancers. The combined analyses covered a total of 2,124,526 person-years (PY) at risk and 15,825 deaths, 3,976 of which were due to cancer. There was no evidence of an association between radiation dose and mortality from all causes or from all cancers. Mortality from leukemia, excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)--the cause of death most strongly and consistently related to radiation dose in studies of atomic bomb survivors and other populations exposed at high dose rates--was significantly associated with cumulative external radiation dose (one-sided P value = 0.046; 119 deaths). Among the 31 other specific types of cancer studied, a significant association was observed only for multiple myeloma (one-sided P value = 0.037; 44 deaths), and this was attributable primarily to the associations reported previously between this disease and radiation dose in the Hanford (U.S.) and Sellafield (UK) cohorts. The excess relative risk (ERR) estimates for all cancers excluding leukemia, and leukemia excluding CLL, the two main groupings of causes of death for which risk estimates have been derived from studies of atomic bomb survivors, were -0.07 per Sv [90% confidence interval (CI): -0.4, 0.3] and 2.18 per Sv (90% CI: 0.1, 5.7), respectively. These values correspond to a relative risk of 0.99 for all cancers excluding leukemia and 1.22 for leukemia excluding CLL for a cumulative protracted dose of 100 mSv compared to 0 mSv. These estimates, which did not differ significantly across cohorts or between men and women, are the most comprehensive and precise direct estimates of cancer risk associated with low-dose protracted exposures obtained to date. Although they are lower than the linear estimates obtained from studies of atomic bomb survivors, they are compatible with a range of possibilities, from a reduction of risk at low doses, to risks twice those on which current radiation protection recommendations are based.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  82 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cosmic radiation and cancer mortality among airline pilots: results from a European cohort study (ESCAPE).

Authors:  I Langner; M Blettner; M Gundestrup; H Storm; R Aspholm; A Auvinen; E Pukkala; G P Hammer; H Zeeb; J Hrafnkelsson; V Rafnsson; H Tulinius; G De Angelis; A Verdecchia; T Haldorsen; U Tveten; H Eliasch; N Hammar; A Linnersjö
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Is it really this simple?

Authors:  Martin Charron; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-09-16

4.  The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Krzysztof W Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Incidence of haematopoietic malignancies in US radiologic technologists.

Authors:  M S Linet; D M Freedman; A K Mohan; M M Doody; E Ron; K Mabuchi; B H Alexander; A Sigurdson; M Hauptmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Radiation dose-rate effects, endogenous DNA damage, and signaling resonance.

Authors:  Michael M Vilenchik; Alfred G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

8.  Leukaemia and occupation: a New Zealand Cancer Registry-based case-control Study.

Authors:  David McLean; Andrea 't Mannetje; Evan Dryson; Chris Walls; Fiona McKenzie; Milena Maule; Soo Cheng; Chris Cunningham; Hans Kromhout; Paolo Boffetta; Aaron Blair; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Ionizing radiation and risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the 15-country study of nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Martine Vrijheid; Elisabeth Cardis; Patrick Ashmore; Anssi Auvinen; Ethel Gilbert; Rima R Habib; Hans Malker; Colin R Muirhead; David B Richardson; Agnes Rogel; Mary Schubauer-Berigan; Hélène Tardy; Maylis Telle-Lamberton
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Incidence of cancer among Nordic airline pilots over five decades: occupational cohort study.

Authors:  Eero Pukkala; Rafael Aspholm; Anssi Auvinen; Harald Eliasch; Maryanne Gundestrup; Tor Haldorsen; Niklas Hammar; Jón Hrafnkelsson; Pentti Kyyrönen; Anette Linnersjö; Vilhjálmur Rafnsson; Hans Storm; Ulf Tveten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.