Literature DB >> 20583277

Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer?

Jaroslav Dolezel1, Johann Greilhuber.   

Abstract

Correct information on genome size is important in many areas of research. For a long time, scientists have been struggling to understand the reason for the huge variation in eukaryotic genome size and its biological significance. More recently, the knowledge on genome size has become important to structure genome sequencing projects as their scale and cost depend on genome size. Despite the fact that the first estimates of genome size in eukaryotes were made more than 50 years ago, we are still not quite sure about the exact genome size in practically all animal and plant species. Moreover, different estimates continue to be published for the same species. These discrepancies compromise data comparison and interpretation and point to methodological problems, which include standardization. This article assesses the current state of DNA reference standards for flow cytometry and the issues related to their calibration.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20583277     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  34 in total

1.  Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bures; Petr Smarda; Tomás Pavlícek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Nutrient reserves may allow for genome size increase: evidence from comparison of geophytes and their sister non-geophytic relatives.

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bureš; Petr Šmarda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  C-value reassessment of plant standards: an image cytometry approach.

Authors:  Milene Miranda Praça-Fontes; Carlos Roberto Carvalho; Wellington Ronildo Clarindo
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  A reassessment of the genome size-invasiveness relationship in reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea).

Authors:  Megan A Martinez; Eric J Baack; Stephen M Hovick; Kenneth D Whitney
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the "best primary standards".

Authors:  Milene Miranda Praça-Fontes; Carlos Roberto Carvalho; Wellington Ronildo Clarindo; Cosme Damião Cruz
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Deep ultraviolet mapping of intracellular protein and nucleic acid in femtograms per pixel.

Authors:  Man C Cheung; James G Evans; Brian McKenna; Daniel J Ehrlich
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  Evolution of genome size in Carex (Cyperaceae) in relation to chromosome number and genomic base composition.

Authors:  Ivana Lipnerová; Petr Bures; Lucie Horová; Petr Smarda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Cytogenetic characterization and genome size of the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.

Authors:  Guilherme Guimarães; Luísa Cardoso; Helena Oliveira; Conceição Santos; Patrícia Duarte; Mariana Sottomayor
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Unravelling hybridization in Phytophthora using phylogenomics and genome size estimation.

Authors:  Kris Van Poucke; Annelies Haegeman; Thomas Goedefroit; Fran Focquet; Leen Leus; Marília Horta Jung; Corina Nave; Miguel Angel Redondo; Claude Husson; Kaloyan Kostov; Aneta Lyubenova; Petya Christova; Anne Chandelier; Slavcho Slavov; Arthur de Cock; Peter Bonants; Sabine Werres; Jonàs Oliva Palau; Benoit Marçais; Thomas Jung; Jan Stenlid; Tom Ruttink; Kurt Heungens
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.515

10.  Genome size variation among and within Camellia species by using flow cytometric analysis.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Yan Tong; Qun-Jie Zhang; Li-Zhi Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.