| Literature DB >> 34193315 |
Kris Van Poucke1, Annelies Haegeman2, Thomas Goedefroit2, Fran Focquet2, Leen Leus2, Marília Horta Jung3,4, Corina Nave5, Miguel Angel Redondo6, Claude Husson7, Kaloyan Kostov8, Aneta Lyubenova8, Petya Christova8, Anne Chandelier9, Slavcho Slavov8, Arthur de Cock10, Peter Bonants11, Sabine Werres5, Jonàs Oliva Palau6,12, Benoit Marçais13, Thomas Jung3,4, Jan Stenlid6, Tom Ruttink2, Kurt Heungens2.
Abstract
The genus Phytophthora comprises many economically and ecologically important plant pathogens. Hybrid species have previously been identified in at least six of the 12 phylogenetic clades. These hybrids can potentially infect a wider host range and display enhanced vigour compared to their progenitors. Phytophthora hybrids therefore pose a serious threat to agriculture as well as to natural ecosystems. Early and correct identification of hybrids is therefore essential for adequate plant protection but this is hampered by the limitations of morphological and traditional molecular methods. Identification of hybrids is also important in evolutionary studies as the positioning of hybrids in a phylogenetic tree can lead to suboptimal topologies. To improve the identification of hybrids we have combined genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and genome size estimation on a genus-wide collection of 614 Phytophthora isolates. Analyses based on locus- and allele counts and especially on the combination of species-specific loci and genome size estimations allowed us to confirm and characterize 27 previously described hybrid species and discover 16 new hybrid species. Our method was also valuable for species identification at an unprecedented resolution and further allowed correct naming of misidentified isolates. We used both a concatenation- and a coalescent-based phylogenomic method to construct a reliable phylogeny using the GBS data of 140 non-hybrid Phytophthora isolates. Hybrid species were subsequently connected to their progenitors in this phylogenetic tree. In this study we demonstrate the application of two validated techniques (GBS and flow cytometry) for relatively low cost but high resolution identification of hybrids and their phylogenetic relations.Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; GBS; Hybrid; Oomycete; Phylogeny; Polyploidy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34193315 DOI: 10.1186/s43008-021-00068-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IMA Fungus ISSN: 2210-6340 Impact factor: 3.515