Literature DB >> 34193315

Unravelling hybridization in Phytophthora using phylogenomics and genome size estimation.

Kris Van Poucke1, Annelies Haegeman2, Thomas Goedefroit2, Fran Focquet2, Leen Leus2, Marília Horta Jung3,4, Corina Nave5, Miguel Angel Redondo6, Claude Husson7, Kaloyan Kostov8, Aneta Lyubenova8, Petya Christova8, Anne Chandelier9, Slavcho Slavov8, Arthur de Cock10, Peter Bonants11, Sabine Werres5, Jonàs Oliva Palau6,12, Benoit Marçais13, Thomas Jung3,4, Jan Stenlid6, Tom Ruttink2, Kurt Heungens2.   

Abstract

The genus Phytophthora comprises many economically and ecologically important plant pathogens. Hybrid species have previously been identified in at least six of the 12 phylogenetic clades. These hybrids can potentially infect a wider host range and display enhanced vigour compared to their progenitors. Phytophthora hybrids therefore pose a serious threat to agriculture as well as to natural ecosystems. Early and correct identification of hybrids is therefore essential for adequate plant protection but this is hampered by the limitations of morphological and traditional molecular methods. Identification of hybrids is also important in evolutionary studies as the positioning of hybrids in a phylogenetic tree can lead to suboptimal topologies. To improve the identification of hybrids we have combined genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and genome size estimation on a genus-wide collection of 614 Phytophthora isolates. Analyses based on locus- and allele counts and especially on the combination of species-specific loci and genome size estimations allowed us to confirm and characterize 27 previously described hybrid species and discover 16 new hybrid species. Our method was also valuable for species identification at an unprecedented resolution and further allowed correct naming of misidentified isolates. We used both a concatenation- and a coalescent-based phylogenomic method to construct a reliable phylogeny using the GBS data of 140 non-hybrid Phytophthora isolates. Hybrid species were subsequently connected to their progenitors in this phylogenetic tree. In this study we demonstrate the application of two validated techniques (GBS and flow cytometry) for relatively low cost but high resolution identification of hybrids and their phylogenetic relations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow cytometry; GBS; Hybrid; Oomycete; Phylogeny; Polyploidy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34193315     DOI: 10.1186/s43008-021-00068-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IMA Fungus        ISSN: 2210-6340            Impact factor:   3.515


  97 in total

1.  Species as ranked taxa.

Authors:  David A Baum
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 2.  The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete "fungi".

Authors:  Gordon W Beakes; Sally L Glockling; Satoshi Sekimoto
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Hybridization and speciation.

Authors:  R Abbott; D Albach; S Ansell; J W Arntzen; S J E Baird; N Bierne; J Boughman; A Brelsford; C A Buerkle; R Buggs; R K Butlin; U Dieckmann; F Eroukhmanoff; A Grill; S H Cahan; J S Hermansen; G Hewitt; A G Hudson; C Jiggins; J Jones; B Keller; T Marczewski; J Mallet; P Martinez-Rodriguez; M Möst; S Mullen; R Nichols; A W Nolte; C Parisod; K Pfennig; A M Rice; M G Ritchie; B Seifert; C M Smadja; R Stelkens; J M Szymura; R Väinölä; J B W Wolf; D Zinner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Source verification of mis-identified Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.

Authors:  Alison E Anastasio; Alexander Platt; Matthew Horton; Erich Grotewold; Randy Scholl; Justin O Borevitz; Magnus Nordborg; Joy Bergelson
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  A Proposal Regarding Best Practices for Validating the Identity of Genetic Stocks and the Effects of Genetic Variants.

Authors:  Joy Bergelson; Edward S Buckler; Joseph R Ecker; Magnus Nordborg; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants.

Authors:  Karine Alix; Pierre R Gérard; Trude Schwarzacher; J S Pat Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb.

Authors:  Michael D Bennett; Ilia J Leitch; H James Price; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation.

Authors:  David H Alexander; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Genotyping-by-sequencing provides the discriminating power to investigate the subspecies of Daucus carota (Apiaceae).

Authors:  Carlos I Arbizu; Shelby L Ellison; Douglas Senalik; Philipp W Simon; David M Spooner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Genotyping-by-Sequencing in a Species Complex of Australian Hummock Grasses (Triodia): Methodological Insights and Phylogenetic Resolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Anderson; Kevin R Thiele; Siegfried L Krauss; Matthew D Barrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4.

Authors:  Q Chen; M Bakhshi; Y Balci; K D Broders; R Cheewangkoon; S F Chen; X L Fan; D Gramaje; F Halleen; M Horta Jung; N Jiang; T Jung; T Májek; S Marincowitz; I Milenković; L Mostert; C Nakashima; I Nurul Faziha; M Pan; M Raza; B Scanu; C F J Spies; L Suhaizan; H Suzuki; C M Tian; M Tomšovský; J R Úrbez-Torres; W Wang; B D Wingfield; M J Wingfield; Q Yang; X Yang; R Zare; P Zhao; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; P W Crous
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 25.731

2.  Phytophthora: an ancient, historic, biologically and structurally cohesive and evolutionarily successful generic concept in need of preservation.

Authors:  Clive Brasier; Bruno Scanu; David Cooke; Thomas Jung
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.044

3.  Draft genome assemblies for tree pathogens Phytophthora pseudosyringae and Phytophthora boehmeriae.

Authors:  Peter Thorpe; Ramesh R Vetukuri; Pete E Hedley; Jenny Morris; Maximilian A Whisson; Lydia R J Welsh; Stephen C Whisson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Genotyping by sequencing suggests overwintering of Peronospora destructor in southwestern Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Hervé Van der Heyden; Pierre Dutilleul; Marc-Olivier Duceppe; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Jean-Benoît Charron; Odile Carisse
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.663

5.  Peronosporales Species Associated with Strawberry Crown Rot in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Matěj Pánek; Marie Maňasová; Jana Wenzlová; Miloslav Zouhar; Jana Mazáková
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 6.  New-Generation Sequencing Technology in Diagnosis of Fungal Plant Pathogens: A Dream Comes True?

Authors:  Maria Aragona; Anita Haegi; Maria Teresa Valente; Luca Riccioni; Laura Orzali; Salvatore Vitale; Laura Luongo; Alessandro Infantino
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.