Literature DB >> 20580092

Videotaped evaluation of eyedrop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual impairment or moderate to severe visual field loss.

Amy L Hennessy1, Joanne Katz, David Covert, Colleen Protzko, Alan L Robin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objectively evaluate the ability of visually disabled glaucoma patients to successfully administer a single drop onto their eye.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Experienced glaucoma patients with Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) of ≤ 6/18 (≤ 20/60) ≥ 1 eye, or moderate or severe visual field damage in ≥ 1 eye.
METHODS: Subjects were "low vision" (20/60 ≤ VA <20/200) or "blind" (light perception <VA ≤ 20/200). They completed a survey about eyedrop use, and were video-recorded instilling 1 drop into their worst-seeing eye in their usual fashion, using a 5-ml bottle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful instillation of a single drop.
RESULTS: Of 204 glaucoma subjects (55% female; 74% Caucasian; 89% primary open-angle glaucoma; mean age, 68.8 ± 13.1 years), 192/204 (94%) used drops >6 months. Subjects used a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 bottles of intraocular pressure-lowering medications to treat their glaucoma. Seventy-six percent (155/204) of subjects had severe visual field damage, with a mean deviation of -14.5 ± 8.0. Twenty-six percent (54/204) had acuity of ≤ 20/200 in ≥ 1 eye, and subjects had a mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution acuity of 0.8 ± 0.9. Seventy-one percent of subjects were able to get a drop onto the eye; only 39% instilled 1 drop onto the eye without touching the ocular surface, instilling a mean 1.4 ± 1.0 drops, using 1.2 ± 0.6 attempts. Of the 142 subjects who denied touching the bottle to the ocular surface, 24% did touch the bottle to the eye. Multiple factors were tested for ability to predict successful application of an eyedrop; however, only age (< 70 vs ≥ 70 years) was found to be a significant predictor for less successful instillation.
CONCLUSIONS: In this video analysis of visually impaired glaucoma patients, we evaluated the difficulty this population has instilling eyedrops, most important, the use of multiple drops per instillation, potential contamination of a chronically used bottle, and poor patient understanding of the situation. Ability to self-administer eyedrops and cost considerations of wasted drops must be thought out before institution of glaucoma therapy. Efforts to determine better methods of eyedrop administration need to be undertaken.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580092     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  29 in total

1.  A novel eye drop application monitor to assess patient compliance with a prescribed regimen: a pilot study.

Authors:  A M Eaton; G M Gordon; A Konowal; A Allen; M Allen; A Sgarlata; G Gao; H Wafapoor; R L Avery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Patterns of Glaucoma Medication Adherence over Four Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Taylor Blachley; Paul P Lee; Michele Heisler; Karen B Farris; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Influence of parental health literacy and dosing responsibility on pediatric glaucoma medication adherence.

Authors:  Rebecca B Freedman; Sarah K Jones; Alice Lin; Alan L Robin; Kelly W Muir
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Development of a novel bioerodible dexamethasone implant for uveitis and postoperative cataract inflammation.

Authors:  Srinivas Rao Chennamaneni; Christina Mamalis; Bonnie Archer; Zack Oakey; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Exploring the influence of patient-provider communication on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Gail E Tudor; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Betsy L Sleath
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-06

7.  How glaucoma patient characteristics, self-efficacy and patient-provider communication are associated with eye drop technique.

Authors:  Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Michelle Vitko; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Betsy Sleath
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2015-08-25

8.  The Effect of Eye Drop Technique Education in Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Jason A Goldsmith; Gail E Tudor; Alan L Robin; Betsy L Sleath
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-11

9.  Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: An Evidence-Based Assessment.

Authors:  Emily M Schehlein; Mona A Kaleem; Ramya Swamy; Osamah J Saeedi
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-12

10.  Impact of the Support, Educate, Empower Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program Pilot Study on Eye Drop Instillation Technique and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Kevin J Schneider; Cecilia N Hollenhorst; Autumn N Valicevic; Leslie M Niziol; Michele Heisler; David C Musch; Stephen M Cain; Paula-Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.