PURPOSE: Objectively evaluate the ability of visually disabled glaucoma patients to successfully administer a single drop onto their eye. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Experienced glaucoma patients with Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) of ≤ 6/18 (≤ 20/60) ≥ 1 eye, or moderate or severe visual field damage in ≥ 1 eye. METHODS: Subjects were "low vision" (20/60 ≤ VA <20/200) or "blind" (light perception <VA ≤ 20/200). They completed a survey about eyedrop use, and were video-recorded instilling 1 drop into their worst-seeing eye in their usual fashion, using a 5-ml bottle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful instillation of a single drop. RESULTS: Of 204 glaucoma subjects (55% female; 74% Caucasian; 89% primary open-angle glaucoma; mean age, 68.8 ± 13.1 years), 192/204 (94%) used drops >6 months. Subjects used a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 bottles of intraocular pressure-lowering medications to treat their glaucoma. Seventy-six percent (155/204) of subjects had severe visual field damage, with a mean deviation of -14.5 ± 8.0. Twenty-six percent (54/204) had acuity of ≤ 20/200 in ≥ 1 eye, and subjects had a mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution acuity of 0.8 ± 0.9. Seventy-one percent of subjects were able to get a drop onto the eye; only 39% instilled 1 drop onto the eye without touching the ocular surface, instilling a mean 1.4 ± 1.0 drops, using 1.2 ± 0.6 attempts. Of the 142 subjects who denied touching the bottle to the ocular surface, 24% did touch the bottle to the eye. Multiple factors were tested for ability to predict successful application of an eyedrop; however, only age (< 70 vs ≥ 70 years) was found to be a significant predictor for less successful instillation. CONCLUSIONS: In this video analysis of visually impaired glaucoma patients, we evaluated the difficulty this population has instilling eyedrops, most important, the use of multiple drops per instillation, potential contamination of a chronically used bottle, and poor patient understanding of the situation. Ability to self-administer eyedrops and cost considerations of wasted drops must be thought out before institution of glaucoma therapy. Efforts to determine better methods of eyedrop administration need to be undertaken.
PURPOSE: Objectively evaluate the ability of visually disabled glaucomapatients to successfully administer a single drop onto their eye. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Experienced glaucomapatients with Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) of ≤ 6/18 (≤ 20/60) ≥ 1 eye, or moderate or severe visual field damage in ≥ 1 eye. METHODS: Subjects were "low vision" (20/60 ≤ VA <20/200) or "blind" (light perception <VA ≤ 20/200). They completed a survey about eyedrop use, and were video-recorded instilling 1 drop into their worst-seeing eye in their usual fashion, using a 5-ml bottle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful instillation of a single drop. RESULTS: Of 204 glaucoma subjects (55% female; 74% Caucasian; 89% primary open-angle glaucoma; mean age, 68.8 ± 13.1 years), 192/204 (94%) used drops >6 months. Subjects used a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 bottles of intraocular pressure-lowering medications to treat their glaucoma. Seventy-six percent (155/204) of subjects had severe visual field damage, with a mean deviation of -14.5 ± 8.0. Twenty-six percent (54/204) had acuity of ≤ 20/200 in ≥ 1 eye, and subjects had a mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution acuity of 0.8 ± 0.9. Seventy-one percent of subjects were able to get a drop onto the eye; only 39% instilled 1 drop onto the eye without touching the ocular surface, instilling a mean 1.4 ± 1.0 drops, using 1.2 ± 0.6 attempts. Of the 142 subjects who denied touching the bottle to the ocular surface, 24% did touch the bottle to the eye. Multiple factors were tested for ability to predict successful application of an eyedrop; however, only age (< 70 vs ≥ 70 years) was found to be a significant predictor for less successful instillation. CONCLUSIONS: In this video analysis of visually impaired glaucomapatients, we evaluated the difficulty this population has instilling eyedrops, most important, the use of multiple drops per instillation, potential contamination of a chronically used bottle, and poor patient understanding of the situation. Ability to self-administer eyedrops and cost considerations of wasted drops must be thought out before institution of glaucoma therapy. Efforts to determine better methods of eyedrop administration need to be undertaken.
Authors: A M Eaton; G M Gordon; A Konowal; A Allen; M Allen; A Sgarlata; G Gao; H Wafapoor; R L Avery Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Taylor Blachley; Paul P Lee; Michele Heisler; Karen B Farris; Joshua D Stein Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Delesha M Carpenter; Gail E Tudor; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Betsy L Sleath Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-07-06
Authors: Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Michelle Vitko; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Betsy Sleath Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Date: 2015-08-25
Authors: Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Jason A Goldsmith; Gail E Tudor; Alan L Robin; Betsy L Sleath Journal: Health Commun Date: 2016-01-11
Authors: Kevin J Schneider; Cecilia N Hollenhorst; Autumn N Valicevic; Leslie M Niziol; Michele Heisler; David C Musch; Stephen M Cain; Paula-Anne Newman-Casey Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-08-08