Literature DB >> 30026790

Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: An Evidence-Based Assessment.

Emily M Schehlein1, Mona A Kaleem1, Ramya Swamy1, Osamah J Saeedi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The advent of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) offers a novel approach in the treatment of glaucoma with the number of procedures developing at an exciting pace. AREAS COVERED: MIGS procedures aim to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) via four mechanisms: (1) increasing trabecular outflow, (2) increasing outflow via suprachoroidal shunts, (3) reducing aqueous production, and (4) subconjunctival filtration. A comprehensive search for published studies for each Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) device or procedure was undertaken using the electronic database PubMed. Search terms included 'minimally invasive glaucoma surgery', 'microincisional glaucoma surgery', and 'microinvasive glaucoma surgery'. A manual search for each device or procedure was also performed. After review, randomized control trials and prospective studies were preferentially included. EXPERT OPINION: These procedures offer several benefits: an improved safety profile allowing for intervention in earlier stages of glaucoma, combination with cataract surgery, and decreased dependence on patient compliance with topical agents. Established MIGS procedures have proven efficacy and more recent devices and procedures show promising results. Despite this, further study is needed to assess the long term IOP-lowering effectiveness of these procedures. Particularly, rigorous study with more randomized control trials and head-to-head comparisons would allow for better informed clinical and surgical decision-making. MIGS offers new solutions for glaucoma treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glaucoma; microinvasive; minimally invasive; procedures; surgical therapy

Year:  2017        PMID: 30026790      PMCID: PMC6049090          DOI: 10.1080/17469899.2017.1335597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1746-9899


  79 in total

1.  Combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: trabeculectomy versus endoscopic laser cycloablation.

Authors:  J L Gayton; M Van Der Karr; V Sanders
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma: randomized double-masked clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Fea
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  A Randomized Trial of a Schlemm's Canal Microstent with Phacoemulsification for Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Norbert Pfeiffer; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa; Jose M Larrosa; Antonio Fea; Hans Lemij; Stefano Gandolfi; Oliver Schwenn; Katrin Lorenz; Thomas W Samuelson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Phacoemulsification combined with a new ab interno gel stent to treat open-angle glaucoma: Pilot study.

Authors:  Arsham Sheybani; Markus Lenzhofer; Melchior Hohensinn; Herbert Reitsamer; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Second-generation trabecular meshwork bypass stent (iStent inject) increases outflow facility in cultured human anterior segments.

Authors:  Cindy K Bahler; Cheryl R Hann; Todd Fjield; David Haffner; Hal Heitzmann; Michael P Fautsch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; M Cristina Leske; Leslie Hyman; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; Stanley J Berke; Laurie Dustin; Robert Noecker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Initial Clinical Experience With the CyPass Micro-Stent: Safety and Surgical Outcomes of a Novel Supraciliary Microstent.

Authors:  Helmut Hoeh; Steven D Vold; Iqbal K Ahmed; Alfonso Anton; Magda Rau; Kuldev Singh; David F Chang; Bradford J Shingleton; Tsontcho Ianchulev
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.

Authors:  E J Higginbotham; R K Stevens; D C Musch; K O Karp; P R Lichter; T J Bergstrom; G L Skuta
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Canaloplasty and Schlemm's Canal Scaffold at 24 Months' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Stefano A Gandolfi; Nicola Ungaro; Stella Ghirardini; Maria Grazia Tardini; Paolo Mora
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Precision medicine to prevent glaucoma-related blindness.

Authors:  Sayoko E Moroi; David M Reed; David S Sanders; Ahmed Almazroa; Lawrence Kagemann; Neil Shah; Nakul Shekhawat; Julia E Richards
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  American Glaucoma Society Position Paper: Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery.

Authors:  Ronald L Fellman; Cynthia Mattox; Kuldev Singh; Brian Flowers; Brian A Francis; Alan L Robin; Michelle R Butler; Manjool M Shah; JoAnn A Giaconi; Arsham Sheybani; Brian J Song; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020 Jan - Feb

Review 3.  Prospective Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Jullia A Rosdahl; Divakar Gupta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-24

4.  Clinical and Visual Field Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Combined with Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Marcus L Turner; Abu M Taha; Sean Yonamine; Yinxi Yu; Murtaza Saifee; Mike Yang; Gui-Shuang Ying; Ying Han; Julius T Oatts
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 5.  Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.

Authors:  Inês C F Pereira; Rosanne van de Wijdeven; Hans M Wyss; Henny J M Beckers; Jaap M J den Toonder
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.