A M Eaton1,2, G M Gordon1,2,3, A Konowal4, A Allen4, M Allen4, A Sgarlata1, G Gao1,2, H Wafapoor1,2, R L Avery2,3. 1. Retina Health Center, Fort Myers, FL, USA. 2. EDIT Systems Inc., Fort Myers, FL, USA. 3. California Retina Consultants, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 4. Konowal Vision Center, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a novel imaging device to allow physicians to personalize therapeutic regimens based on objective patient drop administration data. METHODS: A novel imaging system was used to record video of the drop technique of subjects in clinic (n=25) or at home (n=17) for 1 week. Video assessment by a reading center was compared with patient reporting and their prescribed regimen with respect to how many drops were applied and how many landed in the eye. RESULTS: Reading center assessment of both drops dispensed and drops landing in the eye was significantly different from the prescribed regimen in the clinic (Pd=0.005, Pi<0.001, respectively) and at-home arms (Pd=0.003, Pi<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This imaging system is a powerful tool to help physicians tailor patient therapy more accurately, to help researchers evaluate new drop therapies with objective rather than subjective data, and to potentially facilitate better patient training for improved drug delivery.
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a novel imaging device to allow physicians to personalize therapeutic regimens based on objective patient drop administration data. METHODS: A novel imaging system was used to record video of the drop technique of subjects in clinic (n=25) or at home (n=17) for 1 week. Video assessment by a reading center was compared with patient reporting and their prescribed regimen with respect to how many drops were applied and how many landed in the eye. RESULTS: Reading center assessment of both drops dispensed and drops landing in the eye was significantly different from the prescribed regimen in the clinic (Pd=0.005, Pi<0.001, respectively) and at-home arms (Pd=0.003, Pi<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This imaging system is a powerful tool to help physicians tailor patient therapy more accurately, to help researchers evaluate new drop therapies with objective rather than subjective data, and to potentially facilitate better patient training for improved drug delivery.
Authors: Christine M G Olthoff; Juliette G M M Hoevenaars; Bart W van den Borne; Carroll A B Webers; Jan S A G Schouten Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Manuel Marcel Hermann; Alain Marie Bron; Catherine P Creuzot-Garcher; Michael Diestelhorst Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: David S Friedman; Constance O Okeke; Henry D Jampel; Gui-shuang Ying; Ryan J Plyler; Yuzhen Jiang; Harry A Quigley Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-04-19 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Bonnie Nga Kwan Choy; Ming Ming Zhu; Jason Chun Sum Pang; Jonathan Cheuk Hung Chan; Alex Lap Ki Ng; Michelle Ching Yim Fan; Lawrence Pui Leung Iu; Joseph Shiu Kwong Kwan; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Patrick Ka Chun Chiu Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; Ehud Ivri; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas; Iraklis C Kourtis; Joseph Gilbert; José Francisco Pérez-Vázquez; Mark Blumenkranz; Jesús Jiménez-Román; George Marcellino Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2020-01-20
Authors: Christian J F Bertens; Marlies Gijs; Aylvin A J Dias; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Arkasubhra Ghosh; Swaminathan Sethu; Rudy M M A Nuijts Journal: Drug Deliv Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 6.419