Literature DB >> 32781286

Impact of the Support, Educate, Empower Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program Pilot Study on Eye Drop Instillation Technique and Self-Efficacy.

Kevin J Schneider1, Cecilia N Hollenhorst1, Autumn N Valicevic1, Leslie M Niziol1, Michele Heisler2, David C Musch3, Stephen M Cain4, Paula-Anne Newman-Casey5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) personalized glaucoma coaching program impact on (1) eye drop instillation technique and (2) eye drop instillation self-efficacy.
DESIGN: Prospective pre-post pilot study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension taking ≥1 glaucoma medication, ≥40 years old, spoke English, self-administered their eye drops, and ≤80% adherent to their glaucoma medication by electronic monitoring.
METHODS: Eye drop administration was video recorded before the first SEE in-person coaching session, which included teaching eye drop instillation techniques using a motivational interviewing-based approach. At the third and final in-person counseling session 6 months later, eye drop administration was video recorded. Participants' self-efficacy was assessed using the validated Eye Drop Technique Self-Efficacy Scale (EDTSES) survey at baseline and 1 month after completion of the program. Before and after intervention videos were assessed by an observer masked to time point. Before versus after intervention comparisons were made using McNemar's and paired t tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was change in participants' eye drop instillation technique as measured by (1) accuracy of an eye drop landing on the eye, (2) ability to instill an eye drop on the first attempt, and (3) contaminating the bottle by contact with ocular surface, eyelashes, and skin. The secondary outcome measure was before versus after change in the EDTSES score (6 items, each assessed on a 3-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants completed the SEE intervention, 38 with before and after EDTSES scores and 31 with video recordings. Six of 31 participants instilling drops outside the eye before intervention improved their technique after intervention, whereas 2 participants worsened (P = 0.157). From before to after intervention, participants demonstrated significant improvement in not touching the ocular surface (P = 0.046), the eyelashes (P = 0.020), or the skin (P = 0.025) with the bottle tip. A significant increase was found in eye drop instillation self-efficacy from an average score of 2.6 (standard deviation [SD], 0.3) to 2.8 (SD, 0.2) on the EDTSES score (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: The SEE program significantly decreased eye drop bottle contamination, increased eye drop instillation self-efficacy, and demonstrated an insignificant increase in ability to instill drops successfully and accurately.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence to eye drops; Eye drop adherence; Eye drop instillation; Eye drop instillation technique; Eye drop technique; Motivational interviewing; Personalized coaching program

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32781286      PMCID: PMC7854833          DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma        ISSN: 2589-4196


  41 in total

1.  Evaluating eye drop instillation technique in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Raghav Gupta; Bharat Patil; Bhavin M Shah; Shveta Jindal Bali; Sanjay K Mishra; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The relationship between glaucoma medication adherence, eye drop technique, and visual field defect severity.

Authors:  Betsy Sleath; Susan Blalock; David Covert; Jennifer L Stone; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Kelly Muir; Alan L Robin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence.

Authors:  D E Morisky; L W Green; D M Levine
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Predictors of adherence to glaucoma treatment in a multisite study.

Authors:  Paul F Cook; Sarah J Schmiege; Steven L Mansberger; Jeffrey Kammer; Timothy Fitzgerald; Malik Y Kahook
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-02

Review 6.  Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy.

Authors:  Heather Waterman; Jennifer R Evans; Trish A Gray; David Henson; Robert Harper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  An upright eyedrop bottle: accuracy, usage of excess drops, and contamination compared to a conventional bottle.

Authors:  Isaiah J Davies; Ninita H Brown; Joanne C Wen; Sandra S Stinnett; Kelsey Kubelick; Roma P Patel; Kristin L Benokraitis; Latoya Greene; Curry Cheek; Kelly W Muir
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-28

8.  Eye drop administration in patients attending and not attending a glaucoma education center.

Authors:  Aisha Al-Busaidi; Debbie Anne Samek; Oscar Kasner
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

9.  Personalized behavior change program for glaucoma patients with poor adherence: a pilot interventional cohort study with a pre-post design.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Leslie M Niziol; Chamisa K Mackenzie; Kenneth Resnicow; Paul P Lee; David C Musch; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 10.  Quality of Life in Glaucoma: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Luciano Quaranta; Ivano Riva; Chiara Gerardi; Francesco Oddone; Irene Floriani; Anastasios G P Konstas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.