| Literature DB >> 20579398 |
Richard O Day1, Winston Liauw, Lynette Mr Tozer, Patrick McElduff, Russell J Beckett, Kenneth M Williams.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of health benefits including improvements in acid/base balance, bone metabolism, and cardiovascular risk factors have been attributed to the intake of magnesium rich alkaline mineral water. This study was designed to investigate the effects of the regular consumption of magnesium bicarbonate supplemented spring water on pH, biochemical parameters of bone metabolism, lipid profile and blood pressure in postmenopausal women.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20579398 PMCID: PMC2908636 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Body weight and BMI at all visits for spring water and magnesium bicarbonate (supplemented) spring water groups
| Spring Water (n = 33) | Supplemented Spring Water (n = 34) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | Mean (SD) | 67.99 (11.58) | 68.09 (11.76) | 68.11 (12.03) | 67.86 (11.54) | 64.22 (8.15) | 64.24 (8.32) | 64.10 (8.20) | 64.07 (8.61) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.02 (1.01) | 0.03 (1.40) | -0.21 (1.98) | 0.02 (0.78) | -0.12 (1.36) | -0.15 (1.66) | |||
| *P value | 0.921 | 0.749 | 0.946 | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | Mean (SD) | 25.05 (3.64) | 25.11 (3.71) | 25.11 (3.78) | 25.02 (3.59) | 24.16 (3.14) | 24.17 (3.18) | 24.12 (3.13) | 24.16 (3.14) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.010 (0.38) | 0.009 (0.54) | -0.073 (0.76) | 0.006 (0.29) | -0.048 (0.51) | -0.052 (0.62) | |||
| *P value | 0.991 | 0.681 | 0.930 | ||||||
*p-value (t-test) comparing groups at Day 0 (italics) and for change from Baseline to Day 14, Day 42 and Day 84
Serum bone metabolic markers over the study period for spring water and magnesium bicarbonate (supplemented) spring water groups
| Spring Water (n = 33) | Supplemented Spring Water (n = 34) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parathyroid Hormone (pmol/L) | Mean (SD) | 3.85 (1.79) | 4.57 (2.14) | 4.24 (1.74) | 4.21 (1.96) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.72 (1.52) | -0.02 (1.65) | |||
| *P value | |||||
| 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D (pmol/L) | Mean (SD) | 120.8 (40.9) | 126.8 (40.4) | 118.7 (39.8) | 124.3 (40.7) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 7.1 (49.1) | 5.6 (47.9) | |||
| *P value | 0.766 | ||||
| Osteocalcin | Mean (SD) | 13.73 (5.44) | 14.42 (5.88) | 15.23 (3.89) | 13.79 (3.48) |
| (μg/L) | Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.70 (4.00) | 0.07 (4.00) | -1.31 (3.89) | |
| *P value | 0.104 | ||||
| N-telopeptide excretion | Mean (SD) | 36.7 (21.7) | 40.1 (21.3) | 34.1 (17.8) | 35.1 (15.7) |
| nmol/mM Cr) | Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 3.4 (12.66) | 1.0 (15.97) | ||
| *P value | 0.440 | ||||
| OH proline excretion (nmol/mM Cr) | Mean (SD) | 15.5 (5.39) | 17.2 (6.75) | 15.5 (4.98) | 15.6 (4.57) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 1.6 (5.98) | 0.1 (4.70) | |||
| *P value | 0.216 | ||||
*p-value comparing groups at Day 0 (italics) and for change from Day 0 to Day 84
Serum lipid profile over the study period for spring water and magnesium bicarbonate (supplemented) spring water groups
| Spring Water (n = 33) | Supplemented Spring Water (n = 34) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglyceride | Mean (SD) | 1.12 (0.45) | 0.95 (0.39) | 0.95 (0.32) | 0.92 (0.46) |
| (mmol/L) | Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -0.17 (0.46) | -0.03 (0.39) | ||
| *P value | 0.528 | ||||
| Cholesterol | Mean (SD) | 5.79 (1.6) | 5.69 (1.21) | 5.44 (0.78) | 5.51 (0.93) |
| (mmol/L) | Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -0.10 (0.63) | 0.07 (0.53) | ||
| *P value | 0.484 | ||||
| High Density Lipoprotein | Mean (SD) | 1.72 (0.50) | 1.78 (0.47) | 1.75 (0.32) | 1.77 (0.32) |
| (mmol/L) | Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.05 (0.19) | 0.02 (0.19) | ||
| *P value | 0.576 | ||||
| Low Density Lipoprotein | Mean (SD) | 3.57 (1.38) | 3.48 (1.07) | 3.31 (0.90) | 3.33 (0.89) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -0.08 (0.50) | 0.02 (0.38) | |||
| *P value | 0.611 | ||||
*p-value comparing groups at Day 0 (italics) and for change from Day 0 to Day 84
Blood pressure (BP) and urinary pH over the study period for spring water and magnesium bicarbonate (supplemented) spring water groups
| Spring Water (n = 33) | Supplemented Spring Water (n = 34) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit | Day 0 | Day 84 | Day 0 | Day 84 | |
| §SUPINE SYSTOLIC BP (mm Hg) | Mean (SD) | 119.6 (13.23) | 117.4 (10.73) | 121.5 (13.32) | 121.9 (14.08) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -2.3 (11.64) | 0.4 (10.74) | |||
| *P value | 0.1606 | ||||
| §SUPINE DIASTOLIC BP (mm Hg) | Mean (SD) | 73.1 (8.88) | 72.0 (6.95) | 74.1 (8.47) | 73.9 (8.68) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -1.2 (7.58) | -0.2 (6.36) | |||
| *P value | 0.367 | ||||
| Urinary pH | Mean (SD) | 6.13 (0.93) | 6.17 (0.83) | 6.38 (0.63) | 6.66 (0.56) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.05 (0.86) | 0.28 (0.73) | |||
| *P value | |||||
*p-value comparing groups at Day 0 (italics) and for change from Day 0 to Day 84
§ Standing systolic and diastolic BP showed no significant difference between two water groups (Data not shown)
Serum electrolytes over the study period for spring water and magnesium bicarbonate (supplemented) spring water groups
| Spring Water (n = 33) | Supplemented Spring Water (n = 34) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | Mean (SD) | 27.6 (1.84) | 27.6 (1.60) | 27.9 (1.94) | 27.8 (1.93) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.0 (2.01) | -0.1 (1.60) | |||
| *P value | 0.790 | ||||
| Corrected Calcium (mmol/L) | Mean (SD) | 2.31(0.07) | 2.29 (0.09) | 2.32 (0.08) | 2.31 (0.091) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | -0.03 (0.07) | -0.004 (0.06) | |||
| *P value | 0.1504 | ||||
| Magnesium (mmol/L) | Mean (SD) | 0.86 (0.06) | 0.86 (0.06) | 0.87 (0.05) | 0.90 (0.052) |
| Change from baseline (Day 0) (SD) | 0.006 (0.04) | 0.03 (0.03) | |||
| *P value | |||||
*p-value comparing groups at Day 0 (italics) and for change from Day 0 to Day 84
Figure 1Change in serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) levels in the Magnesium supplemented Bicarbonate spring water and spring water (control) groups at Day 14, 42 and 84. Values are mean ± standard error by treatment group and study day
Figure 2Change in serum Magnesium in the Magnesium Bicarbonate supplemented spring water and spring water (control) groups at Day 14, 42 and 84. Values are mean ± standard error by treatment group and study day
Figure 3Change in Urinary pH in Magnesium Bicarbonate supplemented water and spring water (control) groups at Day 14, 42 and 84. Values are mean ± standard error by treatment group and study day