PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping by using photoacoustic and ultrasonographic (US) imaging with a modified clinical US imaging system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal protocols were approved by the Animal Studies Committee. Methylene blue dye accumulation in axillary lymph nodes of seven healthy Sprague-Dawley rats was imaged by using a photoacoustic imaging system adapted from a clinical US imaging system. To investigate clinical translation, the imaging depth was extended up to 2.5 cm by adding chicken or turkey breast on top of the rat skin surface. Three-dimensional photoacoustic images were acquired by mechanically scanning the US transducer and light delivery fiber bundle along the elevational direction. RESULTS: Photoacoustic images of rat SLNs clearly help visualization of methylene blue accumulation, whereas coregistered photoacoustic/US images depict lymph node positions relative to surrounding anatomy. Twenty minutes following methylene blue injection, photoacoustic signals from SLN regions increased nearly 33-fold from baseline signals in preinjection images, and mean contrast between SLNs and background tissue was 76.0 +/- 23.7 (standard deviation). Methylene blue accumulation in SLNs was confirmed photoacoustically by using the optical absorption spectrum of the dye. Three-dimensional photoacoustic images demonstrate dynamic accumulation of methylene blue in SLNs after traveling through lymph vessels. CONCLUSION: In vivo photoacoustic and US mapping of SLNs was successfully demonstrated with a modified clinical US scanner. These results raise confidence that photoacoustic and US imaging can be used clinically for accurate, noninvasive imaging of SLNs for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping by using photoacoustic and ultrasonographic (US) imaging with a modified clinical US imaging system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal protocols were approved by the Animal Studies Committee. Methylene blue dye accumulation in axillary lymph nodes of seven healthy Sprague-Dawley rats was imaged by using a photoacoustic imaging system adapted from a clinical US imaging system. To investigate clinical translation, the imaging depth was extended up to 2.5 cm by adding chicken or turkey breast on top of the rat skin surface. Three-dimensional photoacoustic images were acquired by mechanically scanning the US transducer and light delivery fiber bundle along the elevational direction. RESULTS: Photoacoustic images of rat SLNs clearly help visualization of methylene blue accumulation, whereas coregistered photoacoustic/US images depict lymph node positions relative to surrounding anatomy. Twenty minutes following methylene blue injection, photoacoustic signals from SLN regions increased nearly 33-fold from baseline signals in preinjection images, and mean contrast between SLNs and background tissue was 76.0 +/- 23.7 (standard deviation). Methylene blue accumulation in SLNs was confirmed photoacoustically by using the optical absorption spectrum of the dye. Three-dimensional photoacoustic images demonstrate dynamic accumulation of methylene blue in SLNs after traveling through lymph vessels. CONCLUSION: In vivo photoacoustic and US mapping of SLNs was successfully demonstrated with a modified clinical US scanner. These results raise confidence that photoacoustic and US imaging can be used clinically for accurate, noninvasive imaging of SLNs for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancerpatients.
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Anand David Purushotham; Sara Upponi; Manfred Borislav Klevesath; Lynda Bobrow; Keith Millar; Jonathan Peter Myles; Stephen William Duffy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J J Albertini; G H Lyman; C Cox; T Yeatman; L Balducci; N Ku; S Shivers; C Berman; K Wells; D Rapaport; A Shons; J Horton; H Greenberg; S Nicosia; R Clark; A Cantor; D S Reintgen Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D Krag; D Weaver; T Ashikaga; F Moffat; V S Klimberg; C Shriver; S Feldman; R Kusminsky; M Gadd; J Kuhn; S Harlow; P Beitsch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dipanjan Pan; Manojit Pramanik; Angana Senpan; Xinmai Yang; Kwang H Song; Mike J Scott; Huiying Zhang; Patrick J Gaffney; Samuel A Wickline; Lihong V Wang; Gregory M Lanza Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2009 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Xueding Wang; J Brian Fowlkes; Jonathan M Cannata; Changhong Hu; Paul L Carson Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Chulhong Kim; Todd N Erpelding; Ladislav Jankovic; Lihong V Wang Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Lei Xi; Guangyin Zhou; Ning Gao; Lily Yang; David A Gonzalo; Steven J Hughes; Huabei Jiang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Junxin Wang; Fang Chen; Santiago J Arconada-Alvarez; James Hartanto; Li-Peng Yap; Ryan Park; Fang Wang; Ivetta Vorobyova; Grant Dagliyan; Peter S Conti; Jesse V Jokerst Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Patrick D Kumavor; Umar Alqasemi; Behnoosh Tavakoli; Hai Li; Yi Yang; Xiaoguang Sun; Edward Warych; Quing Zhu Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.207