Literature DB >> 20571901

A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section.

Ann Josefsson1, Christina Gunnervik, Adam Sydsjö, Gunilla Sydsjö.   

Abstract

To compare Swedish obstetricians/gynecologists and midwives' attitudes and opinions on different aspects of cesarean section (CS). In total 330 midwives from the south east of Sweden and 1280 Swedish obstetricians/gynecologists were asked to answer a study-specific questionnaire anonymously about their opinions on different issues concerning CS. The majority of obstetricians/gynecologists and midwives had more than 10 years of experience in their professions (75.2% vs. 73.6%). The midwives thought that a reasonable CS rate would be 11.5% whereas the corresponding figures for the obstetricians/gynecologists was 13.8% (P < 0.001). There are differences in opinions and attitudes concerning both CS rates and other aspects in connection with CS. There are evident differences in attitudes towards CS and mode of delivery between midwives and obstetricians/gynecologists. These need to be explored and discussed in relation to state-of-the-art knowledge and should become a part of the curriculum for both groups of professionals both in training as well as on a regular clinical basis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20571901     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0630-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  11 in total

1.  Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion.

Authors:  C S Cotzias; S Paterson-Brown; N M Fisk
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation?

Authors:  Dorthe Fuglenes; Pål Oian; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth?

Authors:  Birgit Reime; Michael C Klein; Ann Kelly; Nancy Duxbury; Lee Saxell; Robert Liston; Frédérique Josephine Petra Maria Prompers; Robert Stefan Willem Entjes; Victor Wong
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries.

Authors:  M Habiba; M Kaminski; M Da Frè; K Marsal; O Bleker; J Librero; H Grandjean; P Gratia; S Guaschino; W Heyl; D Taylor; M Cuttini
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.

Authors:  C L Emmett; A R G Shaw; A A Montgomery; D J Murphy
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.

Authors:  Susan Pakenham; Susan M Chamberlain; Graeme N Smith
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-12

7.  Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Christina Gunnervik; Gunilla Sydsjö; Adam Sydsjö; Katarina Ekholm Selling; Ann Josefsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Ingela Rådestad; Christine Rubertsson; Ulla Waldenström
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Attitudes towards mode of birth among Swedish midwives.

Authors:  C Gunnervik; A Josefsson; A Sydsjö; G Sydsjö
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Cesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes.

Authors:  Ulf Högberg; Niels Lynöe; Marianne Wulff
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  4 in total

1.  Maternal and hospital characteristics of non-medically indicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks.

Authors:  Lindsay S Womack; William M Sappenfield; Cheryl L Clark; Washington C Hill; Robert W Yelverton; John S Curran; Linda A Detman; Vani R Bettegowda
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

2.  Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Obstetric outcomes for nulliparous women who received routine individualized treatment for severe fear of childbirth - a retrospective case control study.

Authors:  Gunilla Sydsjö; Marie Bladh; Caroline Lilliecreutz; Anna-Maria Persson; Hanna Vyöni; Ann Josefsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Deirdre Daly; Cecily Begley; Annika Karlström; Birgitta Larsson; Lena Bäck; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.