Literature DB >> 11435000

Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion.

C S Cotzias1, S Paterson-Brown, N M Fisk.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine what proportion of obstetricians would agree to elective pre-labour CS for 'maternal request'.
METHODS: Every fifth consultant on an alphabetical list of obstetricians in England and Wales obtained from the RCOG (243) was surveyed by post and asked (a) "Would you agree to perform an elective CS on a woman with an uncomplicated singleton cephalic pregnancy at term for 'maternal request?"' and (b) if yes, in relation to this 'Has your practice changed over recent years?"
RESULTS: 155 questionnaires were returned (63% response rate -- four unanswered, leaving 151 for analysis). One hundred and four (69%) consultants said they would agree to 'maternal request' for CS. Of the 'yes' respondents, 62 (60%) claimed their practice had changed recently.
CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that a majority of obstetricians are now prepared to agree to maternal request for CS in the absence of obstetric indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11435000     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00360-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  21 in total

1.  A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section.

Authors:  Ann Josefsson; Christina Gunnervik; Adam Sydsjö; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-07

2.  Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial.

Authors:  Peter Stutchfield; Rhiannon Whitaker; Ian Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-22

3.  Reducing the rate of cesarean birth.

Authors:  Mary Lou Moore
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Pregnancy, childbirth, and sexual function: perceptions and facts.

Authors:  A O Yeniel; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Physicians' opinions on patients' requests for specific treatments and examinations.

Authors:  Hanna K Toiviainen; Lauri Vuorenkoski; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The choice of elective cesarean delivery in obstetrics: a voluntary survey of Canadian health care professionals.

Authors:  Scott A Farrell; Thomas F Baskett; Karen D Farrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-24

7.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

8.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

9.  Caesarean delivery and anaemia risk in children in 45 low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Calistus Wilunda; Satomi Yoshida; Marta Blangiardo; Ana Pilar Betran; Shiro Tanaka; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Chitrakan Charoenboon; Kasemsri Srisupundit; Theera Tongsong
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.