Literature DB >> 12118637

Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1, Ingela Rådestad, Christine Rubertsson, Ulla Waldenström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how many women wish to have a caesarean section when asked in early pregnancy, and to identify background variables associated with such a wish.
DESIGN: National survey.
SETTING: Swedish antenatal clinics. POPULATION: 3,283 Swedish-speaking women booked for antenatal care, at approximately 600 Swedish antenatal clinics, during three weeks spread over one year (1999-2000).
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed shortly after the first antenatal visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's preferences for mode of delivery.
RESULTS: 3,061 women completed the first questionnaire, corresponding to 94% of those who consented to participate after exclusion of reported miscarriages. The background characteristics of the study sample were very similar to a one-year cohort of women giving birth in Sweden during 1999. The result showed that 8.2% of the women would prefer to have a caesarean section. A wish for caesarean section was associated with parity, age, civil status, residential area and obstetric history. Women preferring caesarean section were more depressed and worried, not only about giving birth, but also about other things in life. A multivariate logistic regression model showed three factors being statistically associated with a wish for caesarean section: a previous caesarean section, fear of giving birth and a previous negative birth experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few women wish to have a caesarean section when asked in early pregnancy, and these women seem to be a vulnerable group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  48 in total

1.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section.

Authors:  Ann Josefsson; Christina Gunnervik; Adam Sydsjö; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-07

3.  Speaking out! Qualitative insights on the experience of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after a birth by cesarean section.

Authors:  Pam McGrath; Emma Phillips; Grahame Vaughan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Expedited versus conservative approaches for vaginal delivery in breech presentation.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Regina Kulier; Helen M West
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-21

5.  Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Silvio Simeone; Filomena Stile; Guillari Assunta; Gianpaolo Gargiulo; Teresa Rea
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

7.  Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Shobha Mehta; Michael Kruger; Evie Russell; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Jill Milne; Amiram Gafni; Diane Lu; Stephen Wood; Reg Sauve; Sue Ross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Central neuraxial blockade-assisted external cephalic version in reducing caesarean section rate: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bolaji; Lillian Alabi-Isama
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.