Literature DB >> 18972235

Cesarean by choice? Empirical study of public attitudes.

Ulf Högberg1, Niels Lynöe, Marianne Wulff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines public attitudes towards maternal requests for cesarean delivery and its association with health care and birth experiences. In addition, this study attempts to ascertain whether gender, age and residence influence these attitudes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional population survey with a postal questionnaire.
SETTING: The counties of Stockholm and Vasterbotten in Sweden. POPULATION: Equal numbers of women and men between 20 and 80 years of age (n=2,000) by population size and gender distribution.
METHODS: Descriptive statistics and content analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 1,066 women (53%) who responded, two-thirds stated that a cesarean should be decided on for medical reasons and by a doctor. One-third considered that a woman, without persuasion, should decide herself about mode of delivery and should be free to choose a cesarean. These respondents used arguments such as women's rights, bodily integrity and childbirth fear. The results were associated with low trust in health care, women being young or middle aged, urban living and having no children. Low trust in health care was associated with experiences of insecurity, vulnerability and perceived maltreatment.
CONCLUSION: Public norms towards women's own decision making on mode of delivery are associated with younger age, lower trust in health care and urban living. Antenatal care will encounter more parents asking for a cesarean and demanding that health professionals provide an ethically appropriate informed consent process. Considering the risk of violating young women's trust if not respecting her wish, it seems reasonable that making decisions whether or not to perform a cesarean is part of shared decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18972235     DOI: 10.1080/00016340802482978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  4 in total

1.  A comparison between Swedish midwives' and obstetricians' & gynecologists' opinions on cesarean section.

Authors:  Ann Josefsson; Christina Gunnervik; Adam Sydsjö; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-07

2.  The Perceived Health Needs of Primiparous Mothers Referring to Primary Health Care Centers: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Shahin Salarvand; Masoumeh-Sadat Mousavi; Darya Esmaeilbeigy; Farahnaz Changaee; Mohammad Almasian
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 3.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Patient experience studies in the circumpolar region: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christine Ingemann; Nathaniel Fox Hansen; Nanna Lund Hansen; Kennedy Jensen; Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen; Susan Chatwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.