Literature DB >> 20567932

Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Douglas W Cromey1.   

Abstract

Digital imaging has provided scientists with new opportunities to acquire and manipulate data using techniques that were difficult or impossible to employ in the past. Because digital images are easier to manipulate than film images, new problems have emerged. One growing concern in the scientific community is that digital images are not being handled with sufficient care. The problem is twofold: (1) the very small, yet troubling, number of intentional falsifications that have been identified, and (2) the more common unintentional, inappropriate manipulation of images for publication. Journals and professional societies have begun to address the issue with specific digital imaging guidelines. Unfortunately, the guidelines provided often do not come with instructions to explain their importance. Thus they deal with what should or should not be done, but not the associated 'why' that is required for understanding the rules. This article proposes 12 guidelines for scientific digital image manipulation and discusses the technical reasons behind these guidelines. These guidelines can be incorporated into lab meetings and graduate student training in order to provoke discussion and begin to bring an end to the culture of "data beautification".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567932      PMCID: PMC4114110          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  50 in total

Review 1.  Digital imaging guidelines for pathology: a proposal for general and academic use.

Authors:  Bobbi S Pritt; Pamela C Gibson; Kumarasen Cooper
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.

Authors:  Mark W Tengowski
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  The power of the 'pretty picture'.

Authors:  Felice Frankel
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Images to reveal all?

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.

Authors:  Hao Xin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Scientific publishing. Don't pretty up that picture just yet.

Authors:  Jennifer Couzin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Digital forensics and the American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Reproducibility of immunostaining quantification and description of a new digital image processing procedure for quantitative evaluation of immunohistochemistry in pathology.

Authors:  Vagner Bernardo; Simone Q C Lourenço; Renato Cruz; Luiz H Monteiro-Leal; Licínio E Silva; Danielle R Camisasca; Marcos Farina; Ulysses Lins
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.127

9.  Easy-to-alter digital images raise fears of tampering.

Authors:  C Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A false sense of security.

Authors:  Mike Rossner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  38 in total

1.  BioImageXD: an open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform.

Authors:  Pasi Kankaanpää; Lassi Paavolainen; Silja Tiitta; Mikko Karjalainen; Joacim Päivärinne; Jonna Nieminen; Varpu Marjomäki; Jyrki Heino; Daniel J White
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Generalizing on best practices in image processing: a model for promoting research integrity: Commentary on: Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Authors:  Dale J Benos; Sara H Vollmer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Editors' overview: topics in the responsible management of research data.

Authors:  Joe Giffels; Sara H Vollmer; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Directed evolution of a sphingomyelin flippase reveals mechanism of substrate backbone discrimination by a P4-ATPase.

Authors:  Bartholomew P Roland; Todd R Graham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo investigation of cilia structure and function using Xenopus.

Authors:  Eric R Brooks; John B Wallingford
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  A Confocal Reflection Super-Resolution Technique to Image Golgi-Cox Stained Neurons.

Authors:  Mayandi Sivaguru; Yee Ming Khaw; Makoto Inoue
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Manipulation and misconduct in the handling of image data.

Authors:  Cathie Martin; Mike Blatt
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  An innovative method for obtaining consistent images and quantification of histochemically stained specimens.

Authors:  Michael A Linden; Gerald J Sedgewick; Marna Ericson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Digital images are data: and should be treated as such.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

10.  Goals and practicalities of immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry: A guide for submission to the British Journal of Pharmacology.

Authors:  Steve P H Alexander; Richard E Roberts; Brad R S Broughton; Christopher G Sobey; Christopher H George; S Clare Stanford; Giuseppe Cirino; James R Docherty; Mark A Giembycz; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Yong Ji; David J MacEwan; Jonathan Mangum; Sue Wonnacott; Amrita Ahluwalia
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.