Literature DB >> 25575568

An innovative method for obtaining consistent images and quantification of histochemically stained specimens.

Michael A Linden1, Gerald J Sedgewick2, Marna Ericson3.   

Abstract

Obtaining digital images of color brightfield microscopy is an important aspect of biomedical research and the clinical practice of diagnostic pathology. Although the field of digital pathology has had tremendous advances in whole-slide imaging systems, little effort has been directed toward standardizing color brightfield digital imaging to maintain image-to-image consistency and tonal linearity. Using a single camera and microscope to obtain digital images of three stains, we show that microscope and camera systems inherently produce image-to-image variation. Moreover, we demonstrate that post-processing with a widely used raster graphics editor software program does not completely correct for session-to-session inconsistency. We introduce a reliable method for creating consistent images with a hardware/software solution (ChromaCal™; Datacolor Inc., NJ) along with its features for creating color standardization, preserving linear tonal levels, providing automated white balancing and setting automated brightness to consistent levels. The resulting image consistency using this method will also streamline mean density and morphometry measurements, as images are easily segmented and single thresholds can be used. We suggest that this is a superior method for color brightfield imaging, which can be used for quantification and can be readily incorporated into workflows.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords:  ChromaCal; camera; color brightfield; density; histology; image consistency; linearity; microscope; morphometry; quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575568      PMCID: PMC4374058          DOI: 10.1369/0022155415568996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  12 in total

1.  Correction of uneven illumination (vignetting) in digital microscopy images.

Authors:  F J W-M Leong; M Brady; J O'D McGee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization.

Authors:  Yukako Yagi; John R Gilbertson
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Manipulation and misconduct in the handling of image data.

Authors:  Cathie Martin; Mike Blatt
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 4.  A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations.

Authors:  P Chieco; A Jonker; C Melchiorri; G Vanni; C J Van Noorden
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1994-01

5.  The ultimate Wright-Giemsa stain: 60 years in the making.

Authors:  K Dunning; A O Safo
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 6.  Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how?

Authors:  M Dowsett; T Cooke; I Ellis; W J Gullick; B Gusterson; E Mallon; R Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Quantitative image analysis of HIV-1 infection in lymphoid tissue.

Authors:  A T Haase; K Henry; M Zupancic; G Sedgewick; R A Faust; H Melroe; W Cavert; K Gebhard; K Staskus; Z Q Zhang; P J Dailey; H H Balfour; A Erice; A S Perelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Automated selection of DAB-labeled tissue for immunohistochemical quantification.

Authors:  Eric M Brey; Zahid Lalani; Carol Johnston; Mark Wong; Larry V McIntire; Pauline J Duke; Charles W Patrick
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation.

Authors:  Mike Rossner; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  Digital Microscopy, Image Analysis, and Virtual Slide Repository.

Authors:  Famke Aeffner; Hibret A Adissu; Michael C Boyle; Robert D Cardiff; Erik Hagendorn; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Robert Klopfleisch; Susan Newbigging; Dirk Schaudien; Oliver Turner; Kristin Wilson
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Excessive release of inorganic polyphosphate by ALS/FTD astrocytes causes non-cell-autonomous toxicity to motoneurons.

Authors:  Cristian Arredondo; Carolina Cefaliello; Agnieszka Dyrda; Nur Jury; Pablo Martinez; Iván Díaz; Armando Amaro; Helene Tran; Danna Morales; Maria Pertusa; Lorelei Stoica; Elsa Fritz; Daniela Corvalán; Sebastián Abarzúa; Maxs Méndez-Ruette; Paola Fernández; Fabiola Rojas; Meenakshi Sundaram Kumar; Rodrigo Aguilar; Sandra Almeida; Alexandra Weiss; Fernando J Bustos; Fernando González-Nilo; Carolina Otero; Maria Florencia Tevy; Daryl A Bosco; Juan C Sáez; Thilo Kähne; Fen-Biao Gao; James D Berry; Katharine Nicholson; Miguel Sena-Esteves; Rodolfo Madrid; Diego Varela; Martin Montecino; Robert H Brown; Brigitte van Zundert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 18.688

3.  Computational Analysis of Pathological Image Enables Interpretable Prediction for Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Jin Zhu; Wangwei Wu; Yuting Zhang; Shiyun Lin; Yukang Jiang; Ruixian Liu; Heping Zhang; Xueqin Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.