Literature DB >> 12605091

Digital imaging guidelines for pathology: a proposal for general and academic use.

Bobbi S Pritt1, Pamela C Gibson, Kumarasen Cooper.   

Abstract

Digital imaging is an inexpensive and widely available tool that is used by most pathologists in patient reports, education, publication, diagnosis, and data archival. Its popularity is due, in part, to the ease of modifying, storing, enhancing, and annotating images. Since digital manipulation is essentially undetectable in the final product, it poses the potential risk for fraudulent manipulation and heightens the possibility of unintentional misrepresentation. In an attempt to ensure a high degree of uniformity and quality, and to create a professional standardization amongst pathologists, digital imaging guidelines are proposed for use in general and academic practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12605091     DOI: 10.1097/00125480-200303000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  8 in total

1.  Digital images are data: and should be treated as such.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

2.  Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Caption-based topical descriptors for microscopic images as published in academic papers.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Shannon Lamkin; Pam Duncan
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2010-09

4.  Nuclear image analysis study of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Meeja Park; Taehwa Baek; Jongho Baek; Hyunjin Son; Dongwook Kang; Jooheon Kim; Hyekyung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2012-02-23

5.  Transnational telepathology consultations using a basic digital microscope: experience in the Italy-Slovenjia INTERREG project "patient without borders".

Authors:  Donatella Intersimone; Viviana Snoj; Franca Riosa; Nicola Bortolotti; Sandi Sverko; Carlo A Beltrami; Vincenzo Della Mea
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  How to measure image quality in tissue-based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology).

Authors:  Klaus Kayser; Jürgen Görtler; Konradin Metze; Torsten Goldmann; Ekkehard Vollmer; Masoud Mireskandari; Zdravko Kosjerina; Gian Kayser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Maryanne Hornish; Robert A Goulart
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Chi Liu; Yue Huang; Huazhang Guo; Gustavo K Rohde
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.