Literature DB >> 20558210

Temporal patterning of pulses during deep brain stimulation affects central nervous system arousal.

Amy Wells Quinkert1, Nicholas D Schiff, Donald W Pfaff.   

Abstract

Regulation of CNS arousal is important for a wide variety of functions, including the initiation of all motivated behaviors. Usually studied with pharmacological or hormonal tools, CNS arousal can also be elevated by deep brain stimulation (DBS), in the human brain and in animals. The effectiveness of DBS is conventionally held to depend on pulse width, frequency, amplitude and stimulation duration. We demonstrate a novel approach for testing the effectiveness of DBS to increase arousal in intact female mice: all of the foregoing parameters are held constant. Only the temporal patterning of the pulses within the stimulation is varied. To create differentially patterned pulse trains, a deterministic nonlinear dynamic equation was used to generate a series of pulses with a predetermined average frequency. Three temporal patterns of stimulation were defined: two nonlinear patterns, Nonlinear1 (NL1) and Nonlinear2 (NL2), and the conventional pattern, Fixed Frequency (FF). Female mice with bilateral monopolar electrodes were observed before, during and after hippocampal or medial thalamic stimulation. NL1 hippocampal stimulation was significantly more effective at increasing behavioral arousal than either FF or NL2; however, FF and NL2 stimulation of the medial thalamus were more effective than NL1. During the same experiments, we recorded an unpredicted increase in the spectral power of slow waves in the cortical EEG. Our data comprise the first demonstration that the temporal pattern of DBS can be used to elevate its effectiveness, and also point the way toward the use of nonlinear dynamics in the exploration of means to optimize DBS. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558210     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Cognitive activation by central thalamic stimulation: the yerkes-dodson law revisited.

Authors:  Robert G Mair; Kristen D Onos; Jacqueline R Hembrook
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Temporal patterns of deep brain stimulation generated with a true random number generator and the logistic equation: effects on CNS arousal in mice.

Authors:  A W Quinkert; D W Pfaff
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Quantitative descriptions of generalized arousal, an elementary function of the vertebrate brain.

Authors:  Amy Wells Quinkert; Vivek Vimal; Zachary M Weil; George N Reeke; Nicholas D Schiff; Jayanth R Banavar; Donald W Pfaff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Authors:  Oliver B Regele; Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

5.  Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Valentina Pasquale; Maxwell D Murphy; Maria Piera Rogantin; Gustaf M Van Acker; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  A novel combinational approach of microstimulation and bioluminescence imaging to study the mechanisms of action of cerebral electrical stimulation in mice.

Authors:  Dany Arsenault; Janelle Drouin-Ouellet; Martine Saint-Pierre; Petros Petrou; Marilyn Dubois; Jasna Kriz; Roger A Barker; Antonio Cicchetti; Francesca Cicchetti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Long-term high frequency deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens drives time-dependent changes in functional connectivity in the rodent limbic system.

Authors:  Samuel G Ewing; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Central thalamic deep brain stimulation to support anterior forebrain mesocircuit function in the severely injured brain.

Authors:  Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  SaBer DBS: a fully programmable, rechargeable, bilateral, charge-balanced preclinical microstimulator for long-term neural stimulation.

Authors:  Samuel G Ewing; Bernd Porr; John Riddell; Christine Winter; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Temporally-patterned deep brain stimulation in a mouse model of multiple traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Inna Tabansky; Amy Wells Quinkert; Nadera Rahman; Salomon Zev Muller; Jesper Lofgren; Johan Rudling; Alyssa Goodman; Yingping Wang; Donald W Pfaff
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.