Literature DB >> 22228060

Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.

Christian M Simon1, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack.   

Abstract

It is unclear how genomic incidental finding (GIF) prospects should be addressed in informed consent processes. An exploratory study on this topic was conducted with 34 purposively sampled Chairs of institutional review boards (IRBs) at centers conducting genome-wide association studies. Most Chairs (96%) reported no knowledge of local IRB requirements regarding GIFs and informed consent. Chairs suggested consent processes should address the prospect of, and study disclosure policy on, GIFs; GIF management and follow-up; potential clinical significance of GIFs; potential risks of GIF disclosure; an opportunity for participants to opt out of GIF disclosure; and duration of the researcher's duty to disclose GIFs. Chairs were concerned about participant disclosure preferences changing over time; inherent limitations in determining the scope and accuracy of claims about GIFs; and making consent processes longer and more complex. IRB Chair and other stakeholder perspectives can help advance informed consent efforts to accommodate GIF prospects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22228060      PMCID: PMC3616513          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  43 in total

1.  Interpreter accuracy and informed consent among Spanish-speaking families with cancer.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Stephen J Zyzanski; Ellen Durand; Xavier F Jimenez; Xavier Jimenez; Eric D Kodish
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Research in human genetics: the tension between doing no harm and personal autonomy.

Authors:  M K Pelias
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

5.  Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Michelle M Mello; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson; Anupama Bhimavarapu; Emelia J Benjamin; Caroline Fox; Daniel Levy; Gail P Jarvik; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  An open access database of genome-wide association results.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  29 in total

1.  Researcher and institutional review board chair perspectives on incidental findings in genomic research.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack; Nancy Downing; Laura Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Christian Simon
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-02-21

Review 2.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Laura A Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs.

Authors:  Debra S Brandt; Laura Shinkunas; Stephen L Hillis; Sandra E Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack; Nancy R Downing; Megan F Liu; Lisa L Shah; Janet K Williams; Christian M Simon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; P Pearl O'Rourke
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Genetic counseling practice in next generation sequencing research: implications for the ethical oversight of the informed consent process.

Authors:  Nathalie Egalite; Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Jeremy R Garrett; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 9.  Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

Authors:  Jean E McEwen; Joy T Boyer; Kathie Y Sun
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.

Authors:  S Daack-Hirsch; M Driessnack; A Hanish; V A Johnson; L L Shah; C M Simon; J K Williams
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.