Literature DB >> 20556745

Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Christine Kettle1, Therese Dowswell, Khaled Mk Ismail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 70% of women will experience perineal trauma following vaginal delivery and will require stitches. This may result in pain, suture removal and superficial dyspareunia.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different suture materials on short- and long-term morbidity following perineal repair. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing different suture materials for perineal repair after vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 18 trials with 10,171 women; comparisons included: catgut with standard synthetic (nine trials), rapidly absorbing synthetic (two trials), and glycerol impregnated catgut sutures (two trials); and standard synthetic sutures with rapidly absorbing synthetic (five trials) and monofilament sutures (one trial).Compared with catgut, standard synthetic sutures were associated with less pain up to three days after delivery (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.90); and less analgesia up to ten days postpartum (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87). More women with catgut sutures required resuturing (15/1201) compared with synthetic sutures (3/1201) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.74); while more women with standard synthetic sutures required the removal of unabsorbed suture material (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.24). Comparing standard synthetic with rapidly absorbing sutures, short- and long-term pain were similar; in one trial fewer women with rapidly absorbing sutures reported using analgesics at 10 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77). More women in the standard synthetic suture group required suture removal compared with those in the rapidly absorbed group (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.36). There was no evidence of significant differences between groups for long-term pain (three months after delivery) or for dyspareunia at three, or at six to 12 months. When catgut and glycerol impregnated catgut were compared, results were similar for most outcomes, although the latter was associated with more short-term pain. One trial examining monofilament versus standard polyglycolic sutures found no differences for most outcomes. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Catgut may increase short-term pain compared with synthetic sutures. There were few differences between standard and rapidly absorbing synthetic sutures but more women needed standard sutures removing. For other materials, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the related Cochrane review on suturing techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556745      PMCID: PMC7263442          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  32 in total

1.  [Repair of episiotomies with synthetic suture material].

Authors:  A Nikolov; A Dimitrov; D Iliev; K Krŭsteva
Journal:  Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)       Date:  2006

2.  Dyspareunia associated with the use of glycerol-impregnated catgut to repair perineal trauma. Report of a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A Grant; J Sleep; H Ashurst; D Spencer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-06

3.  Episiotomy repair--immediate and long-term sequelae. A prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair.

Authors:  L Isager-Sally; J Legarth; B Jacobsen; E Bostofte
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-05

4.  Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Nathalie Leroux; Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A comparison between catgut and polyglycolic acid sutures in episiotomy repair.

Authors:  E Livingstone; D Simpson; W C Naismith
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1974-03

Review 6.  Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.

Authors:  S B Thacker; H D Banta
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Robert K Hills; Peter Jones; Louisa Darby; Richard Gray; Richard Johanson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment.

Authors:  C M Glazener; M Abdalla; P Stroud; S Naji; A Templeton; I T Russell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-04

Review 9.  Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears.

Authors:  C Kettle; R K Hills; K M K Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

10.  Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide.

Authors:  B R McElhinney; D R Glenn; G Dornan; M A Harper
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2000-05
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Julie Frohlich; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 2.  Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

3.  The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shirin Hasanpoor; Soheila Bani; Rudabe Shahgole; Morteza Gojazadeh
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2012-08-25

4.  Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Margarita Manresa; Ana Pereda; Eduardo Bataller; Carmen Terre-Rull; Khaled M Ismail; Sara S Webb
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for episiotomy repair following vaginal birth.

Authors:  Mercedes Bonet; Erika Ota; Chioma E Chibueze; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-02

6.  How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice.

Authors:  Debra E Bick; Khaled M Ismail; Sue Macdonald; Peter Thomas; Sue Tohill; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Perineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): a matched-pair cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Khaled M K Ismail; Christine Kettle; Sue E Macdonald; Sue Tohill; Peter W Thomas; Debra Bick
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Could Revision of the Embryology Influence Our Cesarean Delivery Technique: Towards an Optimized Cesarean Delivery for Universal Use.

Authors:  Michael Stark; Ospan Mynbaev; Yuri Vassilevski; Patrick Rozenberg
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2016-07

9.  Prevalence of episiotomy in primiparas, related conditions, and effects of episiotomy on suture materials used, perineal pain, wound healing 3 weeks postpartum, in Turkey: A prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Zekiye Karaçam; Hatice Ekmen; Hüsniye Calişır; Sibel Seker
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-05

10.  The effect of vaginal closure technique on early post-operative pain following vaginal prolapse surgery: a feasibility pilot study and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Turlough Maguire; Christopher Mayne; Janet Willars; Douglas Tincello
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.