Literature DB >> 16731075

Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.

Nathalie Leroux1, Emmanuel Bujold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to compare the impact of 3 suture materials on perineal pain and on resumption of sexual intercourse. STUDY
DESIGN: This randomized, controlled trial compared 3 types of suture materials (chromic catgut, polyglactin 910, fast-absorbing polyglactin 910) for second-degree perineal laceration or uncomplicated episiotomy. Patients were enrolled in early labor and assigned randomly to 1 of the 3 suture materials. Pain was evaluated at 48 hours, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The study subjects were questioned about residual perineal pain, resumption of sexual activity, and pain-free sexual intercourse. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken.
RESULTS: Of the 192 patients who were assigned randomly to groups, 66 patients had their perineal laceration repaired with chromic catgut; 60 patients had repair with polyglactin 910, and 66 patients had repair with fast-absorbing polyglactin 910. At 48 hours, there was no significant difference according to the pain measurement scores, but the median consumption of analgesics was significantly lower with fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 than with standard polyglactin 910. There was no difference in the resumption of sexual intercourse at 6 weeks after the delivery between chromic catgut (42%) compared with standard polyglactin 910 group (56%; P = .23). However, it was more frequent for women in the fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 group (66%; P = .02). After adjustment for confounding variables, perineal repair with fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 was associated with a higher rate of sexual intercourse (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.07-6.10) and a higher rate of pain-free sexual intercourse (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.03-6.10) at 6 weeks after delivery.
CONCLUSION: Fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for perineal repair is associated with earlier resumption of sexual intercourse when compared with chromic catgut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 2.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Julie Frohlich; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-10

3.  Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Rachel M Clark
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

4.  A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair.

Authors:  A Bharathi; D B Dharma Reddy; G S Sharath Kote
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-12-24

Review 5.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-04-11

Review 6.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-24

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Jemina Loganathan; John Fahmy; Gabriele Falconi; Maria Rada; Abdullatif Elfituri; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Cornelia Betschart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roeland Odijk; Bernadette Hennipman; Melek Rousian; Khadija Madani; Marja Dijksterhuis; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Arjan van Hof
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.