Literature DB >> 12103284

Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial.

Christine Kettle1, Robert K Hills, Peter Jones, Louisa Darby, Richard Gray, Richard Johanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma to the perineum is a serious and frequent problem after childbirth, with about 350000 women each year in the UK needing sutures for perineal injury after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and many millions more worldwide. We compared the continuous technique of perineal repair with the interrupted method, and the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material with the standard polyglactin 910 material.
METHODS: 1542 women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery with a second-degree perineal tear or episiotomy were randomly allocated to either the continuous (n=771) or interrupted (771) suturing method, and to either the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 suture material (772) or standard polyglactin 910 material (770). Primary outcomes were pain 10 days after delivery and superficial dyspareunia 3 months postpartum. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: At day 10, three women had dropped out of the study. Significantly fewer women reported pain at 10 days with the continuous technique than with the interrupted method (204/770 [26.5%] vs 338/769 [44.0%], odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.38-0.58, p<0.0001). Occurrence of pain did not differ significantly between groups assigned the more rapidly absorbed material or standard material (256/769 [33.3%] vs 286/770 [37.1%], 0.84, 0.68-1.04, p=0.10). Women reported no difference in superficial dyspareunia at 3 months for the continuous vs the interrupted method (98/581 [16.9%] vs 102/593 [17.2%], 0.98, 0.72-1.33, p=0.88) or the more rapidly absorbed versus standard material (105/586 [17.9%] vs 95/588 [16.2%], 1.13, 0.84-1.54, p=0.42). Suture removal was done less with the more rapidly absorbed material than with standard suture material (22/769 [3%] vs 98/770 [13%], p<0.0001), and with the continuous versus interrupted method (24/770 [3%] vs 96/769 [12%], p<0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: A simple and widely practicable continuous repair technique can prevent one woman in six from having pain at 10 days. Also, the more rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 material obviates need for suture removal up to 3 months postpartum for one in ten women sutured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12103284     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09312-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  21 in total

Review 1.  Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

2.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women.

Authors:  Basak Baksu; Inci Davas; Eser Agar; Atif Akyol; Ahmet Varolan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-27

4.  Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables.

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Anne M Fullilove; Noelle Borders; Regina Manocchio; Leah L Albers; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 5.  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

Authors:  Vigdis Aasheim; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Liv Merete Reinar; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 6.  Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

7.  Primary repair of advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears: should it be performed by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique?

Authors:  Yoram Abramov; Beni Feiner; Thalma Rosen; Motti Bardichev; Eli Gutterman; Arie Lissak; Ron Auslander
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-04-03

Review 8.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-24

9.  An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture.

Authors:  Kenichi Hakamada; Shunji Narumi; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Masaki Nara; Kenosuke Ishido; Takuya Miura; Norihito Kubo; Mutsuo Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  PErineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): protocol for a matched pair cluster trial.

Authors:  Debra E Bick; Christine Kettle; Sue Macdonald; Peter W Thomas; Robert K Hills; Khaled M K Ismail
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.