Literature DB >> 20554509

Variable phenotypes of bicuspid aortic valve disease: classification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Stefan Buchner1, Marion Hülsmann, Florian Poschenrieder, Okka W Hamer, Claudia Fellner, Reinhard Kobuch, Stefan Feuerbach, Günter A J Riegger, Behrus Djavidani, Andreas Luchner, Kurt Debl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to allow accurate visualisation and quantification of aortic valve disease. Although bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is relatively rare in the general population, the frequency is high in patients requiring valve surgery. The aim of the current study was to characterise the different phenotypes of BAV disease by CMR.
METHODS: CMR studies were performed on a 1.5 T scanner in 105 patients with BAV.
RESULTS: The pattern of BAV phenotypes was as follows: a raphe was identified in 90 patients (86%). Among patients with raphe, 76 patients had fusion between the right and left cusps (RL) and 14 patients had fusion between the right and the non-coronary cusps (RN). There were no significant differences in the aortic dimensions in the different BAV phenotypes.
CONCLUSION: CMR allows excellent characterisation of valve phenotype in patients with BAV. The present data demonstrate that a raphe is present in the vast majority of cases and RL fusion is the predominant phenotype of BAV. No significant differences in the aortic dimensions were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554509     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.186254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  16 in total

1.  Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Seung Choul Lee; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Characteristics of aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dimensions according to bicuspid aortic valve morphology.

Authors:  Hong Ju Shin; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.

Authors:  So Hyeon Bak; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comprehensive 4-stage categorization of bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology by cardiac MRI in 386 patients.

Authors:  I G Murphy; J Collins; A Powell; M Markl; P McCarthy; S C Malaisrie; J C Carr; A J Barker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Association between bicuspid aortic valve morphotype and regional dilatation of the aortic root and trunk.

Authors:  Karam M Habchi; Elena Ashikhmina; Vanessa Montiero Vieira; Jasmin T Shahram; Eric M Isselbacher; Thoralf M Sundt; Prem Shekar; Jochen D Muehlschlegel; Simon C Body
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Multimodality Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Sabir Abdul Karim; Sherif Mahmoud Helmy
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

7.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and aortopathy: nomenclature and role of aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08

9.  Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root: A single modality approach.

Authors:  Melissa M Levack; Gianclaudio Mecozzi; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Wobbe Bouma; Arminder S Jassar; Alison M Pouch; Paul A Yushkevich; Massimo A Mariani; Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 1.778

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.

Authors:  Stefan Buchner; Kurt Debl; Franz-Xaver Schmid; Andreas Luchner; Behrus Djavidani
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.