Literature DB >> 28299607

Comprehensive 4-stage categorization of bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology by cardiac MRI in 386 patients.

I G Murphy1, J Collins1, A Powell1, M Markl1,2, P McCarthy3, S C Malaisrie3, J C Carr1, A J Barker4.   

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is heterogeneous and related to valve dysfunction and aortopathy. Appropriate follow up and surveillance of patients with BAV may depend on correct phenotypic categorization. There are multiple classification schemes, however a need exists to comprehensively capture commissure fusion, leaflet asymmetry, and valve orifice orientation. Our aim was to develop a BAV classification scheme for use at MRI to ascertain the frequency of different phenotypes and the consistency of BAV classification. The BAV classification scheme builds on the Sievers surgical BAV classification, adding valve orifice orientation, partial leaflet fusion and leaflet asymmetry. A single observer successfully applied this classification to 386 of 398 Cardiac MRI studies. Repeatability of categorization was ascertained with intraobserver and interobserver kappa scores. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI findings was determined from operative reports, where available. Fusion of the right and left leaflets accounted for over half of all cases. Partial leaflet fusion was seen in 46% of patients. Good interobserver agreement was seen for orientation of the valve opening (κ = 0.90), type (κ = 0.72) and presence of partial fusion (κ = 0.83, p < 0.0001). Retrospective review of operative notes showed sensitivity and specificity for orientation (90, 93%) and for Sievers type (73, 87%). The proposed BAV classification schema was assessed by MRI for its reliability to classify valve morphology in addition to illustrating the wide heterogeneity of leaflet size, orifice orientation, and commissural fusion. The classification may be helpful in further understanding the relationship between valve morphology, flow derangement and aortopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortopathy; Bicuspid aortic valve; MRI; Valve disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299607     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1107-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  25 in total

1.  Bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortic dilation in the young.

Authors:  Susan Fernandes; Paul Khairy; Dionne A Graham; Steven D Colan; Teresa C Galvin; Stephen P Sanders; Michael N Singh; Ami Bhatt; Ronald V Lacro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Familial thoracic aortic dilation and bicommissural aortic valve: a prospective analysis of natural history and inheritance.

Authors:  Melissa L Loscalzo; Denise L M Goh; Bart Loeys; Kathleen C Kent; Philip J Spevak; Harry C Dietz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Aortic dilatation patterns and rates in adults with bicuspid aortic valves: a comparative study with Marfan syndrome and degenerative aortopathy.

Authors:  Delphine Detaint; Hector I Michelena; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Alec Vahanian; Guillaume Jondeau; Maurice Enriquez Sarano
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Toward individualized management of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve surgery: the role of valve phenotype in 1362 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Ulrich Stierle; Salah A Mohamed; Thorsten Hanke; Doreen Richardt; Claudia Schmidtke; Efstratios I Charitos
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Subodh Verma; Samuel C Siu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  New insights in the association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype, aortic configuration and valve haemodynamics.

Authors:  Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Ulrich Stierle; Rebecca M S Hachmann; Efstratios I Charitos
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Amber D Khanna; Douglas Mahoney; Edit Margaryan; Yan Topilsky; Rakesh M Suri; Ben Eidem; William D Edwards; Thoralf M Sundt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is more diagnostic than 2-dimensional echocardiography in determining the presence of bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Issam Mikati; Vera Rigolin; Byron K Yip; Brittany Lapin; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Variable phenotypes of bicuspid aortic valve disease: classification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Stefan Buchner; Marion Hülsmann; Florian Poschenrieder; Okka W Hamer; Claudia Fellner; Reinhard Kobuch; Stefan Feuerbach; Günter A J Riegger; Behrus Djavidani; Andreas Luchner; Kurt Debl
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Echocardiographic and color flow Doppler findings in military pilot applicants.

Authors:  G W Gray; D A Salisbury; A M Gulino
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1995-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Misclassification of bicuspid aortic valves is common and varies by imaging modality and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Peyton M Cramer; Siddharth K Prakash
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Alessandro Della Corte; Arturo Evangelista; Joseph J Maleszewski; William D Edwards; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Borja Fernández; Federico M Asch; Alex J Barker; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Laurent De Kerchove; Susan M Fernandes; Paul W M Fedak; Evaldas Girdauskas; Victoria Delgado; Suhny Abbara; Emmanuel Lansac; Siddharth K Prakash; Malenka M Bissell; Bogdan A Popescu; Michael D Hope; Marta Sitges; Vinod H Thourani; Phillippe Pibarot; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Patrizio Lancellotti; Michael A Borger; John K Forrest; John Webb; Dianna M Milewicz; Raj Makkaar; Martin B Leon; Stephen P Sanders; Michael Markl; Victor A Ferrari; William C Roberts; Jae-Kwan Song; Philipp Blanke; Charles S White; Samuel Siu; Lars G Svensson; Alan C Braverman; Joseph Bavaria; Thoralf M Sundt; Gebrine El Khoury; Ruggero De Paulis; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Jeroen J Bax; Catherine M Otto; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-07-22

4.  Weakly supervised classification of aortic valve malformations using unlabeled cardiac MRI sequences.

Authors:  Jason A Fries; Paroma Varma; Vincent S Chen; Ke Xiao; Heliodoro Tejeda; Priyanka Saha; Jared Dunnmon; Henry Chubb; Shiraz Maskatia; Madalina Fiterau; Scott Delp; Euan Ashley; Christopher Ré; James R Priest
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Clinical implications of the biomechanics of bicuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Ali Fatehi Hassanabad; Melissa A King; Elena Di Martino; Paul W M Fedak; Julio Garcia
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 6.  Unraveling Bicuspid Aortic Valve Enigmas by Multimodality Imaging: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Arturo Evangelista Masip; Laura Galian-Gay; Andrea Guala; Angela Lopez-Sainz; Gisela Teixido-Turà; Aroa Ruiz Muñoz; Filipa Valente; Laura Gutierrez; Ruben Fernandez-Galera; Guillem Casas; Alejandro Panaro; Alba Marigliano; Marina Huguet; Teresa González-Alujas; Jose Rodriguez-Palomares
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.