Literature DB >> 20549683

Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern?

Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac1, Madan M Rehani, Kui Hian Sim, Houng Bang Liew, Eliseo Vano, Norman J Kleiman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of radiation-associated lens opacities among interventional cardiologists and nurses and correlate with occupational radiation exposure.
BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiology personnel are exposed to relatively high levels of X-rays and based on recent findings of radiation-associated lens opacities in other cohorts, they may be at risk for cataract without use of ocular radiation protection.
METHODS: Eyes of interventional cardiologists, nurses, and age- and sex-matched unexposed controls were screened by dilated slit lamp examination and posterior lens changes graded using a modified Merriam-Focht technique. Individual cumulative lens X-ray exposure was calculated from responses to a questionnaire and personal interview.
RESULTS: The prevalence of radiation-associated posterior lens opacities was 52% (29/56, 95% CI: 35-73) for interventional cardiologists, 45% (5/11, 95% CI: 15-100) for nurses, and 9% (2/22, 95% CI: 1-33) for controls. Relative risks of lens opacity was 5.7 (95% CI: 1.5-22) for interventional cardiologists and 5.0 (95% CI: 1.2-21) for nurses. Estimated cumulative ocular doses ranged from 0.01 to 43 Gy with mean and median values of 3.4 and 1.0 Gy, respectively. A strong dose-response relationship was found between occupational exposure and the prevalence of radiation-associated posterior lens changes.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a dose dependent increased risk of posterior lens opacities for interventional cardiologists and nurses when radiation protection tools are not used. While study of a larger cohort is needed to confirm these findings, the results suggest ocular radio-protection should be utilized.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549683     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  46 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  [Eye lens radiation exposure during ureteroscopy with and without a face protection shield: Investigations on a phantom model].

Authors:  G Zöller; M Figel; J Denk; K Schulz; A Sabo
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A review of non-cancer effects, especially circulatory and ocular diseases.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Physicians' exposure to radiation during electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Laurent Faroux; Charline Daval; François Lesaffre; Thierry Blanpain; Jean-Pierre Chabert; Angeline Martin; Mathias Guinot; Nicolas Luconi; Madeline Espinosa; Pierre Nazeyrollas; Christophe Tourneux; Damien Metz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors:  U O'Connor; C Walsh; A Gallagher; A Dowling; M Guiney; J M Ryan; N McEniff; G O'Reilly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of the effect of a radiation-attenuating drape on radiation exposure to endoscopy staff during ERCP.

Authors:  Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Harry R Aslanian; Loren Laine; James Farrell; Maria M Ciarleglio; Yanhong Deng; Henry Ho; Priya A Jamidar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Hand Surgery and Fluoroscopic Eye Radiation Dosage: A Prospective Pilot Comparison of Large Versus Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy Use.

Authors:  Mark L Wang; C Edward Hoffler; Asif M Ilyas; William H Kirkpatrick; Pedro K Beredjiklian; Charles F Leinberry
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 8.  C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgical practice.

Authors:  Ishaq Ojodu; Ayodele Ogunsemoyin; Sascha Hopp; Tim Pohlemann; Oluwole Ige; Oluwaseun Akinola
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-23

9.  Changing Patterns in the Performance of Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures and Adherence to Radiation Safety Practices in a U.S. Cohort of Radiologic Technologists.

Authors:  Hyeyeun Lim; Martha S Linet; Miriam E Van Dyke; Donald L Miller; Steven L Simon; Alice J Sigurdson; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Occupational cataracts and lens opacities in interventional cardiology (O'CLOC study): are X-Rays involved? Radiation-induced cataracts and lens opacities.

Authors:  Sophie Jacob; Morgane Michel; Christian Spaulding; Serge Boveda; Olivier Bar; Antoine P Brézin; Maté Streho; Carlo Maccia; Pascale Scanff; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.