Literature DB >> 31177353

Physicians' exposure to radiation during electrophysiology procedures.

Laurent Faroux1,2, Charline Daval3, François Lesaffre3, Thierry Blanpain3,4, Jean-Pierre Chabert3, Angeline Martin3, Mathias Guinot3, Nicolas Luconi3, Madeline Espinosa3, Pierre Nazeyrollas3, Christophe Tourneux4, Damien Metz3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiologists are among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionizing radiation, but there is no study comparing the level of exposure of physicians during different electrophysiology procedures. We aimed to measure and compare cardiologists' exposure to radiation during different electrophysiology procedures.
METHODS: The study population comprised all electrophysiology procedures performed over a 6-month period in a large referral centre. The endpoint was operator radiation exposure, assessed using a personal electronic dosimeter located on the operator's left arm.
RESULTS: In total, 150 electrophysiology procedures were analyzed. Compared with electrophysiology studies (reference category), physician radiation exposure was 3-fold greater during ablation of atrial fibrillation, 9-fold greater during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT)/atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNT), and 10-fold greater during ablation of atrial flutter (p < 0.001). Physician exposure was mainly related to X-ray time (R2 = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed significant differences in cardiologists' exposure to ionizing radiation depending on the type of electrophysiology procedure. Atrial flutter and AVNRT/AVNT ablations are the procedures in which operators are most exposed to ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; Electrophysiology; Radiation protection; Radiation risk

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31177353     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00568-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern?

Authors:  Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac; Madan M Rehani; Kui Hian Sim; Houng Bang Liew; Eliseo Vano; Norman J Kleiman
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden.

Authors:  N Theocharopoulos; J Damilakis; K Perisinakis; E Manios; P Vardas; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures.

Authors:  K Perisinakis; J Damilakis; N Theocharopoulos; E Manios; P Vardas; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes.

Authors:  Camille Brasselet; Thierry Blanpain; Sophie Tassan-Mangina; Alain Deschildre; Sébastien Duval; Fabien Vitry; Nathalie Gaillot-Petit; Jean Paul Clément; Damien Metz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Laurent Macle; Rukshen Weerasooriya; Pierre Jais; Christophe Scavee; Florence Raybaud; Kee-Joon Choi; Meleze Hocini; Jacques Clementy; Michel Haissaguerre
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Jacob Goldstein; Olivier Bar
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Patient and staff radiation dosimetry during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures: a comprehensive analysis.

Authors:  Efstathios P Efstathopoulos; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Sofia Kottou; Nectarios Kalivas; Efthalia Tzanalaridou; Eleftherios Giazitzoglou; Socrates Korovesis; Keith Faulkner
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 8.  Radiation effects in fluoroscopically guided cardiac interventions--keeping them under control.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Pedro Ortiz-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections.

Authors:  H Calkins; L Niklason; J Sousa; R el-Atassi; J Langberg; F Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Luciano Gonzalez; Jose M Fernández; Ziv J Haskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Results from a real-time dosimetry study during left atrial ablations performed with ultra-low dose radiation settings.

Authors:  T Schreiber; N Kähler; S Biewener; V Tscholl; P Nagel; P Attanasio; U Landmesser; M Huemer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2021-05-11

2.  The impact of current strategy using intracardiac echocardiography, lesion index, and minimum substrate ablation on clinical outcomes after catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tetsuma Kawaji; Takanori Aizawa; Shun Hojo; Akihiro Kushiyama; Hidenori Yaku; Kenji Nakatsuma; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Masashi Kato; Takafumi Yokomatsu; Shinji Miki
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-08-05

3.  Cardiac catheterization real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

Authors:  Chun-Yuan Tu; Chung-Jung Lin; Bang-Hung Yang; Jay Wu; Tung-Hsin Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.