Literature DB >> 20549403

Investigation of the ovarian and prostate cancer peptidome for candidate early detection markers using a novel nanoparticle biomarker capture technology.

Claudia Fredolini1, Francesco Meani, Alessandra Luchini, Weidong Zhou, Paul Russo, Mark Ross, Alexis Patanarut, Davide Tamburro, Guido Gambara, David Ornstein, Franco Odicino, Monica Ragnoli, Antonella Ravaggi, Francesco Novelli, Devis Collura, Leonardo D'Urso, Giovanni Muto, Claudio Belluco, Sergio Pecorelli, Lance Liotta, Emanuel F Petricoin.   

Abstract

Current efforts to identify protein biomarkers of disease use mainly mass spectrometry (MS) to analyze tissue and blood specimens. The low-molecular-weight "peptidome" is an attractive information archive because of the facile nature by which the low-molecular-weight information freely crosses the endothelial cell barrier of the vasculature, which provides opportunity to measure disease microenvironment-associated protein analytes secreted or shed into the extracellular interstitium and from there into the circulation. However, identifying useful protein biomarkers (peptidomic or not) which could be useful to detect early detection/monitoring of disease, toxicity, doping, or drug abuse has been severely hampered because even the most sophisticated, high-resolution MS technologies have lower sensitivities than those of the immunoassays technologies now routinely used in clinical practice. Identification of novel low abundance biomarkers that are indicative of early-stage events that likely exist in the sub-nanogram per milliliter concentration range of known markers, such as prostate-specific antigen, cannot be readily detected by current MS technologies. We have developed a new nanoparticle technology that can, in one step, capture, concentrate, and separate the peptidome from high-abundance blood proteins. Herein, we describe an initial pilot study whereby the peptidome content of ovarian and prostate cancer patients is investigated with this method. Differentially abundant candidate peptidome biomarkers that appear to be specific for early-stage ovarian and prostate cancer have been identified and reveal the potential utility for this new methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549403      PMCID: PMC2977006          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-010-9211-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  56 in total

1.  A simple affinity spin tube filter method for removing high-abundant common proteins or enriching low-abundant biomarkers for serum proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Young Y Wang; Paul Cheng; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Clinical proteomics: written in blood.

Authors:  Lance A Liotta; Mauro Ferrari; Emanuel Petricoin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Classical cadherin adhesion molecules: coordinating cell adhesion, signaling and the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Marita Goodwin; Alpha S Yap
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 4.  Urine markers in monitoring for prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Jamaspishvili; M Kral; I Khomeriki; V Student; Z Kolar; J Bouchal
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Integrin and growth factor receptor crosstalk.

Authors:  B P Eliceiri
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Proteomic analysis of human bile and potential applications for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Annarita Farina; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Pierre Lescuyer
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  The role of an 80 kDa fragment of E-cadherin in the metastatic progression of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rainer Kuefer; Matthias D Hofer; Juergen E Gschwend; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Sanda; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin; Mark L Day
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  The role of cell adhesion molecules in the progression of colorectal cancer and the development of liver metastasis.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Paschos; David Canovas; Nigel C Bird
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.315

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Assessment of a fragment of e-cadherin as a serum biomarker with predictive value for prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Kuefer; M D Hofer; C S M Zorn; O Engel; B G Volkmer; M A Juarez-Brito; M Eggel; J E Gschwend; M A Rubin; M L Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Fishing for the hidden peptidome in health and disease (drug abuse).

Authors:  Lloyd D Fricker; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Hydrogel nanoparticle harvesting of plasma or urine for detecting low abundance proteins.

Authors:  Ruben Magni; Benjamin H Espina; Lance A Liotta; Alessandra Luchini; Virginia Espina
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Current state of the art for enhancing urine biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Michael Harpole; Justin Davis; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  A xenograft mouse model coupled with in-depth plasma proteome analysis facilitates identification of novel serum biomarkers for human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hsin-Yao Tang; Lynn A Beer; Tony Chang-Wong; Rachel Hammond; Phyllis Gimotty; George Coukos; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Proteomics of ovarian cancer: functional insights and clinical applications.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elzek; Karin D Rodland
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Charged poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanogels for use as differential protein receptors in a turbidimetric sensor array.

Authors:  Heidi R Culver; Ishna Sharma; Marissa E Wechsler; Eric V Anslyn; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Quantitative peptidomics for discovery of circadian-related peptides from the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Leonid Zamdborg; Bruce R Southey; Norman Atkins; Jennifer W Mitchell; Mingxi Li; Martha U Gillette; Neil L Kelleher; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Identification of differentially expressed proteins in direct expressed prostatic secretions of men with organ-confined versus extracapsular prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yunee Kim; Vladimir Ignatchenko; Cindy Q Yao; Irina Kalatskaya; Julius O Nyalwidhe; Raymond S Lance; Anthony O Gramolini; Dean A Troyer; Lincoln D Stein; Paul C Boutros; Jeffrey A Medin; O John Semmes; Richard R Drake; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 9.  Contribution of the plasma and lymph Degradome and Peptidome to the MHC Ligandome.

Authors:  Laura Santambrogio; Hans-Georg Rammensee
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.846

10.  Multifunctional core-shell nanoparticles: discovery of previously invisible biomarkers.

Authors:  Davide Tamburro; Claudia Fredolini; Virginia Espina; Temple A Douglas; Adarsh Ranganathan; Leopold Ilag; Weidong Zhou; Paul Russo; Benjamin H Espina; Giovanni Muto; Emanuel F Petricoin; Lance A Liotta; Alessandra Luchini
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.